Analysis of wireless and catenary power transfer systems for electric vehicle range extension on rural highways

Abstract

This paper analyzes two different transportation electrification charging schemes, i.e., an embedded wireless power transfer system and an overhead catenary wire system, for use in range extension of electric vehicles on rural highways. The efficiency, feasibility, and benefits of the two schemes are examined. Electric vehicles currently lack widespread popularity mainly due to battery limitations, especially for long distance travel. The rural highway charging methods presented here can greatly increase the range of electric vehicles while decreasing battery sizes. Average modeling approaches for power electronics and vehicle usage were developed in MATLAB/Simulink to compare the two systems, each at two power levels. 30 kW and 48 kW were chosen to demonstrate the differences between power levels, both capable of maintaining a positive net charge on a dynamic electric vehicle.Component efficiencies, energy transfer levels, and installation percentages for the various models were determined. The models were applied to California highway I-5 to show immense potential savings over gasoline vehicles. It was shown that catenary charging is cheaper and has higher energy transfer than wireless; however, it has difficulty servicing all vehicle types, has visible wires, and requires more maintenance. A small scale hardware prototype of the WPT system was created in order to demonstrate the feasibility of power transfer at the proposed relative distances and speeds.

Double-Coupling Resonant Network for Dynamic IPT Systems Used in EV Charging Applications

“…To implement a DIPT system, multiple transmitters are used to form a charging lane on the roadway [9,25,26]. A typical DIPT pad placement is presented in the top part of Figure 2, where multiple transmitter pads are embedded on the roadway.…”

Assessing the value of electric vehicle managed charging: a review of methodologies and results

“…There are major technology and infrastructure barriers to implement dynamic charging, but it could eliminate most range limitations and require smaller batteries. 77–79 Charging flexibility also depends on the vehicle utilization; personal EVs, for example, may have higher flexibility due to longer parked periods compared to ride-hailing or other fleet vehicles that are driven more.…”

Technoecological analysis of energy carriers for long‐haul transportation

“…With manufacturer information and a vehicle weight model (Section 3.1), the weight of the OC system is estimated to be 600 kg. The inductive charging technology has higher losses ( η = 0.88 [Navidi, Cao, & Krein, ]) that depend on the overlap of the receiving and transmitting coils. The prototype system weight is 591 kg (Karakitsios et al., ; Olsson, ).…”