2014
DOI: 10.1186/s12870-014-0287-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of wild-species introgressions in tomato inbreds uncovers ancestral origins

Abstract: BackgroundDecades of intensive tomato breeding using wild-species germplasm have resulted in the genomes of domesticated germplasm (Solanum lycopersicum) being intertwined with introgressions from their wild relatives. Comparative analysis of genomes among cultivated tomatoes and wild species that have contributed genetic variation can help identify desirable genes, such as those conferring disease resistance. The ability to identify introgression position, borders, and contents can reveal ancestral origins an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Breeders have long recognized the value of crop wild relatives (CWRs) as sources of novel beneficial variation for resistance or tolerance to stresses (Bessey, 1906;Harlan and de Wet, 1971;Hajjar and Hodgkin, 2007). In this respect, most of the modern varieties of several important crops, like wheat or tomato, carry introgressions from wild relatives (Menda et al, 2014;Wulff and Moscou, 2014). CWRs are wild species that are able to exchange genes with the cultivated taxa through sexual or somatic hybridization (Harlan andde Wet, 1971, Maxted et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Breeders have long recognized the value of crop wild relatives (CWRs) as sources of novel beneficial variation for resistance or tolerance to stresses (Bessey, 1906;Harlan and de Wet, 1971;Hajjar and Hodgkin, 2007). In this respect, most of the modern varieties of several important crops, like wheat or tomato, carry introgressions from wild relatives (Menda et al, 2014;Wulff and Moscou, 2014). CWRs are wild species that are able to exchange genes with the cultivated taxa through sexual or somatic hybridization (Harlan andde Wet, 1971, Maxted et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of single, historic, and widely used alleles such as Pm-0 , the potential for historical recombination events in at least some cultivars to have reduced the size of the candidate interval around the gene of interest is high, barring chromosomal inversions or other rearrangements present in the region containing the introgression. Previously, this approach has been used to map other major resistance genes derived from wild species in tomato [37, 38]. Our study has advantages over previous efforts in that only one gene from one wild donor species is known to be widespread among current cultivars for the trait of interest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, disease resistance traits have been disregarded, resulting in cultivars highly susceptible to many pathogens (Foolad, 2007). Wild tomato species, in contrast, such as S. chilense, S. peruvianum, S. habrochaites, S. parviflorum, S. pennellii or S. pimpinellifolium, are considered a rich source of disease resistance genes and have been utilized in breeding programmes for the introgression of these genes into cultivated varieties to improve their resistance (Menda et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%