1993
DOI: 10.1016/0378-7788(93)90030-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of water heater standby energy consumption from ELCAP homes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This number is very close compared to other studies. For example, Pratt et.al [15] and [17] assumed that heat losses from the hot water storage cylinder would be around 24% . In terms of the distribution system, heat losses were about 8% in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This number is very close compared to other studies. For example, Pratt et.al [15] and [17] assumed that heat losses from the hot water storage cylinder would be around 24% . In terms of the distribution system, heat losses were about 8% in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the biggest disadvantage is cost: electricity is relatively more expensive compared to natural gas. Pratt et.al [15] estimated that the average standby load of electric hot water tanks was about 1200 kWh/yr accounting for 24% of the total energy consumption for hot water production. Armstrong et.al [16] found that de-stratifying a system to sterilise the bacteria led to a 19% reduction in the effective hot water storage capability.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%