2016
DOI: 10.3390/rs8120973
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Vegetation Indices to Determine Nitrogen Application and Yield Prediction in Maize (Zea mays L.) from a Standard UAV Service

Abstract: Abstract:The growing use of commercial unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) and the need to adjust N fertilization rates in maize (Zea mays L.) currently constitute a key research issue. In this study, different multispectral vegetation indices (green-band and red-band based indices), SPAD and crop height (derived from a multispectral compact camera mounted on a UAV) were analysed to predict grain yield and determine whether an additional sidedress application of N fertilizer was required just before flowering. Seve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
101
3
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
5
101
3
3
Order By: Relevance
“…WDRVI and EVI were respectively saturated at 45% and 58% of the maximum yield, and, together with the PltH (56%), were the least accurate at differentiating among the highest grain yields. These results partially disagree with those presented by Maresma et al [35], who in a one year-site study found the WDRVI to be the best grain predictor using a high-resolution UAV service. Nevertheless, although in the present study the plateau was not reached for high relative grain yield, there was a clear tendency of increasing WDRVI values when increasing the yield (Figure 5f).…”
Section: Correlation Between Vegetation Indices Spad and Plant Heighcontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…WDRVI and EVI were respectively saturated at 45% and 58% of the maximum yield, and, together with the PltH (56%), were the least accurate at differentiating among the highest grain yields. These results partially disagree with those presented by Maresma et al [35], who in a one year-site study found the WDRVI to be the best grain predictor using a high-resolution UAV service. Nevertheless, although in the present study the plateau was not reached for high relative grain yield, there was a clear tendency of increasing WDRVI values when increasing the yield (Figure 5f).…”
Section: Correlation Between Vegetation Indices Spad and Plant Heighcontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…However, the maize N extractions were probably not completely covered by the determined GYON r and GYON a in the linear-plateau model. In similar environments, Maresma et al [35] and Yagüe and Quílez [70] reported respectively a GYON r of 239.8 and 300 kg N ha −1 , where the N extraction of maize is around 250-300 kg N ha −1 [8][9][10]. These N rates can be considered low compared to the extractions, but if N is provided when needed, maize could uptake the N and translates it into yield.…”
Section: Grain Yield and Economic Return Responses To N Rates And Avamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…UAV-based applications in agronomy comprise biomass estimation via plant height measurements [17,18], LAI estimation [19,20], analysis of phenology [21] and yield prediction [22][23][24], amongst others.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%