Analysis of the use of the hate speech on social media in the case of presidential election in 2019

Abstract

This study is entitled "Analysis of the Use of Hate Speech on Social Media in the Case of Presidential Election in 2019". The object of this study focused on words, phrases, and speech phrases of hate speech contained on social media Instagram and Facebook account in January-April 2019. The purpose of this study was to find out the use of hate speech uttered by netizens on presidential candidate pairs on Instagram and Facebook accounts, which was analyzed based on the Chief of Police's circular letter about seven speeches of hate, and identified the utterances of hatred that were more dominantly used in the social media. The research model used is qualitative research. The results of this study were derived from the speech on Instagram and Facebook social media in the 2019 presidential election. On the Instagram media, 200 sentences were analyzed in the form of hate speech, namely insulting 34 sentences or 17.5%. Denigration of 43 sentences or 21.5%. Defamation 1 sentence or 0.5%. 33. Unpleasant sentences or 16.5%. Provoke 55 sentences or 27%. Instigation numbered 21 sentences or 10.5% and spread hoaxes (hoax) 13 sentences or 6.5%. The most dominant form of hate speech on Instagram social media is provoking. In the Facebook media, there are 200 sentences found in the form of hate speech, namely insulting 8 sentences or 4%. Denigration is 40 sentences or 20%. Defamation is 9 sentences or 4.5%. An unpleasant act of 53 sentences or 28.7%. Provoke 29 sentences or 14.5%. Instigating 61 sentences or 30.5%. and spreading hoaxes (hoax) not found on Facebook's social media. The most dominant form of hate speech found on Facebook accounts is inciting.

An Analysis of Speech Acts on Headlines Medan Newspaper

“…Meanwhile, cultural pragmatics studies that is broader in its users in a cultural, social, psychological context with the topic of speech pragmatics. Yule in Wiana [7] defines pragmatics as the study of meaning conveyed by speakers or researchers and interpreted by listeners or readers. This study concedes more to do with the analysis of what people mean by their utterances than with the separate meanings of the words or phrases used in the speech itself.…”

The Using of Javanese Language as a Hate Speech in Sosial Media

“…Benson also gives information about research perspective on social media and brand communication [5]. In politics fields, Juditha conducted research about hate speech in 2017 Jakarta's election [6], Wiana about hate speech in 2019 presidential election [7], Ben-David and Matamoros-Fernandez about hate speech extremeright parties in Spain [8]. Furthermore, in the field of law, Mathias provides arguments about hate speech and its threat to the law enforcement.…”

Hate Expression Found on Twitter as a Response to Meghan Markle

“…According to Levinson, as cited in Wiana (2019), pragmatics is the study of language use. The study of language use is the first step in comprehending language by studying the relationship between language and context.…”

“…Some previous researchers conducted the same research that the topic is about hate expression with a different focus. Hamnö (2019), Subyantoro & Siroj (2019), Rangkuti et al (2019), andWiana (2019) have researched hate speech in social media on political scope. Sari et al (2019), Hafisa & Hanidar (2020, and Kadhum (2021) observed hate speech that was viewed from an impoliteness strategy perspective that was found in movies.…”