2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jflm.2014.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the procedures used to evaluate suicide crime scenes in Brazil: A statistical approach to interpret reports

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
2
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The following parameters were evaluated: a) Correlation coefficient for cross validation Q 2 = 0.98021 b) Correlation coefficient for calibration R 2 = 0.98211 c) Values for Root Mean Square error for cross validation (RMSEV) 0.016841 d) and Root Mean Square error for calibration (RMSEC) 0.016233 The results obey the conditions for a strength modeling: Q 2 <R 2 and RMSEV< RMSEC. [23,24] Cross validation was performed removing from one to 51 samples (Leave One Out (LOO) until Leave 51 Out (LNO, N=51)). The idea was to observe the behavior of the modeling by removing more than 10% of the samples.…”
Section: Pls Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The following parameters were evaluated: a) Correlation coefficient for cross validation Q 2 = 0.98021 b) Correlation coefficient for calibration R 2 = 0.98211 c) Values for Root Mean Square error for cross validation (RMSEV) 0.016841 d) and Root Mean Square error for calibration (RMSEC) 0.016233 The results obey the conditions for a strength modeling: Q 2 <R 2 and RMSEV< RMSEC. [23,24] Cross validation was performed removing from one to 51 samples (Leave One Out (LOO) until Leave 51 Out (LNO, N=51)). The idea was to observe the behavior of the modeling by removing more than 10% of the samples.…”
Section: Pls Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three PCs were selected for the model, accounting for around 94% of the information as a whole. The parameters were found to obey the conditions for a strength modeling: Q 2 <R 2 and RMSEV>RMSEC: [23,24] a) Correlation coefficient for cross validation Q 2 = 0.97759; b) Correlation coefficient for calibration R 2 = 0.97872; c) Root Mean Square error for Validation (RMSEV): 0.015571; d) Root Mean Square error for Calibration (RMSEC): 0.015228. Cross validation was performed removing from one to 51 samples (Leave One Out (LOO) until Leave 51 Out (LNO, N=51)).…”
Section: Pls Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16,17,18 No país, recentemente foi publicado um artigo científico a respeito da qualidade dos laudos periciais de locais de suicídio. 19 Sobre a influência de laudos em decisões judiciais, poucos artigos e publicações relativos ao assunto foram avistados. Entretanto, existe uma busca internacional pelo não uso da subjetividade em documentos oficiais.…”
Section: Justificativaunclassified
“…Em conjuntos pequenos, procede-se desta forma com todas as amostras. 19,95,96 Para fortalecer a modelagem, outros indicadores foram utilizados neste trabalho: 19,97 o Coeficiente de correlação interna do modelo de validação cruzada (Q²), dado por:…”
Section: Sum Of Squares Press) O Desvio Padrão Da Validação Cruzadaunclassified