2007
DOI: 10.1097/01.olq.0000245986.62775.b6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the Operational Costs of Using Rapid Syphilis Tests for the Detection of Maternal Syphilis in Bolivia and Mozambique

Abstract: It is feasible to introduce rapid syphilis testing in settings without laboratory services at a small incremental cost per woman screened. In settings with laboratories, the cost of ICS is similar to that of RPR.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previously published costs per woman screened with RSTs vary between $1.25 and $4.87 depending on prevalence rates, outcome probabilities used, and costs included in the analysis [29][30][31][32]. Our finding that RST costs for testing and treatment are lower than those for RPR is unique; previous studies have reported RST costs per woman screened to be $0.17 -$1.07 higher than those for RPR.…”
Section: Cost Of Screeningmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Previously published costs per woman screened with RSTs vary between $1.25 and $4.87 depending on prevalence rates, outcome probabilities used, and costs included in the analysis [29][30][31][32]. Our finding that RST costs for testing and treatment are lower than those for RPR is unique; previous studies have reported RST costs per woman screened to be $0.17 -$1.07 higher than those for RPR.…”
Section: Cost Of Screeningmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…A recent internet search of the terms “treponemal test kit” showed that these tests currently retail for US$0.20–US$0.50 per unit [27]. However, in order to account for additional equipment that may be required over and above what is contained in a test kit (e.g., gloves), we used the low end of the historical range in our model (e.g., US$0.74) [28]. Similarly, the cost of a single dose of benzathine penicillin injection, excluding the cost of administration, has been reported to be in the range of US$0.77–US$1.92, and we used the higher estimate of that range (US$1.92) [7].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Available data on the antenatal cost-effectiveness of POCT show that the ICS TT tests are cost-effective for the detection of maternal syphilis in low-resource settings compared to either standard 2-test algorithms (i.e., NTT followed by TT) or a NTT alone (65)(66)(67). Owusu-Edesei and colleagues recently reported that a screening strategy employing an ICS TT cost less than a dual-POCT (TT and NTT) strategy in a high-prevalence setting but that the dual-POCT strategy may significantly reduce overtreatment (68).…”
Section: Poctmentioning
confidence: 99%