1974
DOI: 10.1016/0008-8749(74)90043-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the limiting-dilution assay used for estimating frequencies of immunocompetent units

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was due to a substantial cell loss during the treatment of small numbers of purified spleen cells with collagenase, although collagenase did not affect the viability of the cells (19) . A problem encountered in culturing low cell numbers is the lower than expected PFC response by low numbers of cells to antigenic stimulation as depicted by the shoulder in limiting dilution curves (for review see 28) . In our microculture system, there was also no linear cell dose response relationship .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was due to a substantial cell loss during the treatment of small numbers of purified spleen cells with collagenase, although collagenase did not affect the viability of the cells (19) . A problem encountered in culturing low cell numbers is the lower than expected PFC response by low numbers of cells to antigenic stimulation as depicted by the shoulder in limiting dilution curves (for review see 28) . In our microculture system, there was also no linear cell dose response relationship .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In vitro limiting dilution assay was conducted as reported . The glioma cells were serially diluted to the final cell concentrations (10,000, 1000, 100, 10, 1 cells/well in 100 μL of culture medium) in culture medium and added to the 96-well plate on day 0.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In vitro limiting dilution assay was conducted as reported. 36 The glioma cells were serially diluted to the final cell concentrations (10,000, 1000, 100, 10, 1 cells/well in 100 μL of culture medium) in culture medium and added to the 96-well plate on day 0. After one day of incubation, indicated doses of C16 were added to each well and the cells were cultured for another 10 days.…”
Section: ■ Experimental Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estimates of ARC frequency were determined for each responding cell population by the linear regression analysis of the Poisson distribution (Halsall & Makinodan 1974. The probability of a nonresponse is given by the zero order term, Po = e-vN, where v=frequency of ARC and N = t h e number of responding lymphocytes per well.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%