2016
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b02103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the Hysteresis Behavior of Perovskite Solar Cells with Interfacial Fullerene Self-Assembled Monolayers

Abstract: ABSTRACT:The use of self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) of fullerene derivatives reduces 11 the hysteresis of perovskite solar cells (PSCs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
71
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(65 reference statements)
1
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The hysteresis effect has been ubiquitouslyo bserved in perovskite solar cells and its origins are generally related to the presence of traps, ion motion and even ferroelectric effects. [36][37][38] With the passivation of surface traps by DMBG, it is interesting to examine the hysteresis in our perovskite solar cells. For this purpose, we recorded J-V characteristics of CH 3 rections are summarized in Ta ble 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hysteresis effect has been ubiquitouslyo bserved in perovskite solar cells and its origins are generally related to the presence of traps, ion motion and even ferroelectric effects. [36][37][38] With the passivation of surface traps by DMBG, it is interesting to examine the hysteresis in our perovskite solar cells. For this purpose, we recorded J-V characteristics of CH 3 rections are summarized in Ta ble 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, an increasing number of studies indicate enhanced PCEs in connection with a diminished or even hysteresis-free behavior. This is typically achieved by improving the electron extraction and by reducing the number of surface traps, employing fullerene derivatives [6][7][8], electron selective layers such as SnO 2 [9][10][11] or ZnO [12], by optimizing the growth of the perovskite active layer [13,14], by impurity co-doping of the electron transfer layer [15] or of the perovskite absorber [16]. However, in general, as the employed measurement procedures are rather different and, in some cases, insufficiently controlled or specified, it is quite difficult to assess and compare the potential hysteretic effects: to what extent the hysteretic effects or their absence are truly related to fabrication methods or are a consequence of the measurement conditions?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hysteresis index (HI) is calculated according to ref. : HI =JRS(0.8VOC)JFS(0.8VOC)JRS(0.8VOC). Interestingly, the GdF 3 –aminobutanol‐based device shows the smallest hysteresis index of 0.016, while the hysteresis index of pristine one is 0.090.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%