2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2013.11.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the effects of process parameters in residual stress measurements on Titanium plates by HDM/ESPI

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of these works use HDM as validation of nondestructive techniques such as ultrasonic [41][42][43][44][45][46], XRD [30] and neutron diffraction [31]. Pappalettere et al [47][48][49][50][51][52] applied an electronic speckle pattern interferometry (ESPI) method to avoid the use of conventional rosette strain gauges. The ESPI is based on the correlation between two speckle patterns, each one created by the interference between a reference beam and the image of an object illuminated by a laser.…”
Section: Orthogonality and Zeroingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some of these works use HDM as validation of nondestructive techniques such as ultrasonic [41][42][43][44][45][46], XRD [30] and neutron diffraction [31]. Pappalettere et al [47][48][49][50][51][52] applied an electronic speckle pattern interferometry (ESPI) method to avoid the use of conventional rosette strain gauges. The ESPI is based on the correlation between two speckle patterns, each one created by the interference between a reference beam and the image of an object illuminated by a laser.…”
Section: Orthogonality and Zeroingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once the initial and the final phases are determined, it is possible to calculate the amount of displacement of each point into the analysis area. Figure 3 shows the experimental ESPI set-up [47]. In fact, rosette strain gauges introduce a not negligible cost particularly in the case where a relevant number of measurements are required.…”
Section: Orthogonality and Zeroingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As indicated in the previous section, experimental determinations of an unknown state of stress (residual or internal stresses) are usually performed with these curves and XECs S 2 (hkl) and S 1 (hkl) values of the specimen, using Eq. 14, instead of the stress factors [18][19][20][21][22]. Due to the influence of the morphologic texture on the e uw -versussin 2 w diagrams, their interpretation in terms of macroscopic stresses will, therefore, lead to a state of stress more or less far from the real stress in the material.…”
Section: Influence Of Morphologic Texture On Stress Analysis By Diffrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strictly speaking, in the case of elastically macroscopically anisotropic materials, XECs cannot be used; diffraction stress factors must be applied. Because the stress factors are much more difficult to determine than the XECs, experimentally as by modelling, XECs are often used instead of the stress factor [18][19][20][21][22]. Thus, significant deviations between the real stress state and the one determined experimentally by diffraction methods may occur.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optical methods like projection moiré (PM), electronic speckle pattern interferometry (ESPI) and digital holography interferometry (DHI) appear to be good candidates to perform this task. All of these methods have been widely and successfully used in experimental mechanics to get full field information about in-plane and out-of plane displacements [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] with high accuracy and resolution. However preliminary comparative studies [10] show that digital holography appears to be too much sensitive to vibration to be implemented in an hand-held device while problems can arise in ESPI connected with the presence of saliva in the endoral environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%