2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2015.06.056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the dissipative mechanisms in metal–elastomer interfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…11. Comparison of the calculated peel front geometries with the experimentally measured shapes (Neggers et al, 2015) confirm the appropriateness of the proposed set of boundary conditions.…”
Section: Influence Of the Failure Stresssupporting
confidence: 59%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…11. Comparison of the calculated peel front geometries with the experimentally measured shapes (Neggers et al, 2015) confirm the appropriateness of the proposed set of boundary conditions.…”
Section: Influence Of the Failure Stresssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…No significant influence of the loading angle is visible which may seem surprising, as mode dependency is a commonly reported phenomenon for interface fracture toughness values (Hutchinson and Suo, 1992;Reeder and Crews, 1990). However, peel tests on these particular metal-elastomer fibrillating interfaces reveal only a negligible mode dependency (Neggers et al, 2015). These numerical results thus provide a physical explanation for the experimental observations.…”
Section: Mixed-mode Loadingmentioning
confidence: 52%
See 3 more Smart Citations