2019
DOI: 10.1101/694364
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of task-based functional MRI data preprocessed with fMRIPrep

Abstract: Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is widely used to investigate the neural correlates of cognition. fMRI non-invasively measures brain activity, allowing identification of patterns evoked by tasks performed during scanning. Despite the long history of this technique, the idiosyncrasies of each dataset have led to the use of ad-hoc preprocessing protocols customized for nearly every different study. This approach is time-consuming, error-prone, and unsuitable for combining datasets from many sources.… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, objective neuroimaging markers in psychiatry have been elusive, and hence the impact of neuroimaging‐based approaches on pragmatic clinical decision‐making in psychiatry is so far extremely limited. Moreover, several methodological issues in the neuroimaging literature have been highlighted in recent years, including small sample sizes and the resulting power failures leading to a “replication crisis” (Button et al, 2013; Masouleh et al, 2019; Poldrack et al, 2017; Szucs & Ioannidis, 2017) as well as the dependency on analysis pipelines (Botvinik‐Nezer et al, 2020) and modest test‐retest reliability (Esteban et al, 2020), which further hinder the potential application of neuroimaging in clinical psychiatry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, objective neuroimaging markers in psychiatry have been elusive, and hence the impact of neuroimaging‐based approaches on pragmatic clinical decision‐making in psychiatry is so far extremely limited. Moreover, several methodological issues in the neuroimaging literature have been highlighted in recent years, including small sample sizes and the resulting power failures leading to a “replication crisis” (Button et al, 2013; Masouleh et al, 2019; Poldrack et al, 2017; Szucs & Ioannidis, 2017) as well as the dependency on analysis pipelines (Botvinik‐Nezer et al, 2020) and modest test‐retest reliability (Esteban et al, 2020), which further hinder the potential application of neuroimaging in clinical psychiatry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of the steps involved in preparing and preprocessing the MRI data employed recently developed tools and workflows aimed at enhancing standardization and reproducibility of task-based fMRI studies [for a similar preprocessing pipeline, see 96]. Following successful acquisition, all study data were arranged according to the BIDS specification [97] using the tool (version 0.6.0.dev1; freely available from https://github.com/nipy/heudiconv) running inside a container [98, 99] to facilitate further analysis and sharing of the data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 3D T1-weighted anatomical scan was acquired for registration purposes, and fMRI data were acquired using a single-shot echo-planar imaging sequence (parameters: TR/TE = 2300/30 ms, resolution = 2.3 × 2.3 × 3 mm, 39 sequential slices, FA = 80 • , dynamics = 70). Preprocessing was performed using FMRIPREP v.1.2.3 (Esteban et al, 2019(Esteban et al, , 2020 (RRID: SCR 016 216). Each T1-weighted (T1w) scan was normalized to MNI space.…”
Section: Fmrimentioning
confidence: 99%