2012
DOI: 10.5301/jabfm.2012.9273
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Tantalum Implants used for Avascular Necrosis of the Femoral Head: A Review of Five Retrieved Specimens

Abstract: Nevertheless, the results obtained in the quantitative assessment of this process proved to be similar to those results achieved by other authors in previous experimental work studies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(90 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, tantalum forms a self-passivating surface oxide layer that leads to the formation of a bone-like apatite coating in vivo. This surface allowed excellent bone and fibrous in-growth properties that led to a rapid and substantial bone and soft tissue attachment [30,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, tantalum forms a self-passivating surface oxide layer that leads to the formation of a bone-like apatite coating in vivo. This surface allowed excellent bone and fibrous in-growth properties that led to a rapid and substantial bone and soft tissue attachment [30,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently in 2011, Howard et al [33] reported on their early results following the use of porous tantalum femoral cones in 24 revision TKAs at an average 33 months (minimum 24 months) following implantation. These revision procedures were performed for a variety of reasons, including aseptic loosening (11), staged reimplantation for infection (7), severe osteolysis (3), periprosthetic fracture (2), and severe instability (1). The authors reported improvements in the Knee Society score from 55 to 81 at final follow-up as well as good radiographic fixation of the cone at an average 35 months in 20/20 patients (not all patients had asdequate radiographs).…”
Section: Trabecular Metal (Zimmer Warsaw In)mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…After the failure of tantalum rod implantation, it was converted to THA. Extracting a rod is technically demanding due to strong osseointegration of the porous tantalum rod (10). Challenges inclu0de increased blood loss, longer operative time, bone loss along the trajectory of the rod and the subsequent potential increased risk of femoral fracture (44,45).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surface of the rod has a high-volume porosity (75-80%) with interconnected pores (mean; 430 µm) similar to bone, allowing for primary stability and rapid bone in-growth (9). Soft tissue has been indicated to grow on the rod for 4 weeks post-implantation in an animal model (10). Additionally, a biomechanical fatigue test demonstrated that the rod can bear 4-fold the bodyweights of humans and has an intensity that is 9.3-fold greater than the pressure it resists post-implantation, permitting physiological load-bearing (11,12).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%