2010
DOI: 10.1002/pd.2615
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of secondary ultrasound markers in the first trimester before chorionic villus sampling

Abstract: Assessment of secondary ultrasound markers is feasible in clinical practice and their use could reduce the number of unnecessary invasive procedures by 30%.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We found that inclusion of the markers in a contingent screening set up can reduce the number of women who are screened positive by the combined screening strategy. This is in accordance with a number of reports from similar studies . In the majority of the published work the study populations are small subpopulations often with high risk for trisomy 21.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We found that inclusion of the markers in a contingent screening set up can reduce the number of women who are screened positive by the combined screening strategy. This is in accordance with a number of reports from similar studies . In the majority of the published work the study populations are small subpopulations often with high risk for trisomy 21.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This first trimester combined screening strategy is associated with a detection rate of about 90% for a false positive rate of 5% . Several authors have studied ductus venosus flow and tricuspid flow as additional ultrasound markers for trisomy 21 . Fetuses with trisomy 21 more often have abnormal ductus venosus blood flow and/or abnormal tricuspid flow (tricuspid regurgitation) compared with euploid fetuses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the expanded combined test, an improved screening efficacy has been reported in previous studies, obtaining both an increased DR and a reduced FPR (10-29%) [15,25]. In our series, only the addition of DV or NB ± DV to the combined test resulted in a reduction of FPR by about one fourth (25-29%), similar to that reported in a previous study [14]. Concerning the contingent screening approach, in our series the use of DV ± TF resulted in a significant 42% FPR reduction (from 6.9 to 4.0%) with a marginal DR increase.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…They can be concurrently assessed in all pregnancies (expanded combined test), or sequentially in selected pregnancies, with either lower (stepwise sequential screening) or intermediate risk (contingent screening) [11,12,13]. Typically these additional markers may decrease the false positive rate resulting from the combined test [14,15]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Screening for fetal anomalies earlier and more accurately will be the goal in the future [ 88 - 90 ]. Bearing this objective in mind, the evaluation of secondary ultrasound markers is essential [ 91 ]. Visualization of tricuspid blood flow in the first trimester is possible in most cases [ 49 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%