1997
DOI: 10.1255/ejms.177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of ruthenium carbonyl–porphyrin complexes: a comparison of matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation time-of-flight, fast-atom bombardment and field desorption mass spectrometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Porphyrinoids are characterized by a great variety of structure types; hence, it is not possible to analyze them by using only one ionization method. There are many examples in the literature regarding the application of various MS ionization techniques [EI, [2,3] chemical ionization (CI), [4,5] electrospray ionization (ESI), [6][7][8][9][10][11] atmospheric pressure CI (APCI), [12][13][14] atmospheric pressure photoionization (APPI), [15][16][17][18] fast atom bombardment (FAB), [19][20][21] liquid secondary ion MS, [22,23] field desorption, [24][25][26] matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) [19,27,28] ] with reference to this class of compounds. It is also possible to find examples of comparison of ionization methods in qualitative terms, but the number of such publications is very limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Porphyrinoids are characterized by a great variety of structure types; hence, it is not possible to analyze them by using only one ionization method. There are many examples in the literature regarding the application of various MS ionization techniques [EI, [2,3] chemical ionization (CI), [4,5] electrospray ionization (ESI), [6][7][8][9][10][11] atmospheric pressure CI (APCI), [12][13][14] atmospheric pressure photoionization (APPI), [15][16][17][18] fast atom bombardment (FAB), [19][20][21] liquid secondary ion MS, [22,23] field desorption, [24][25][26] matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) [19,27,28] ] with reference to this class of compounds. It is also possible to find examples of comparison of ionization methods in qualitative terms, but the number of such publications is very limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[20] Frauenkron et al compared MALDI, FAB and field desorption in the analysis of ruthenium carbonyl-porphyrin complexes. [24] Forest et al illustrated differences between EI, FAB and CI for dihalogenotitanium porphyrins. [29] However, there is lack of examples of study concerning the comparison of ionization methods in terms of their sensitivity towards different classes of porphyrinoids, both as free bases and as their complexes with metal cations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the EI spectra of 1 and 2, the LIFDI spectra do not exhibit loss of CO molecules or alkyl groups, the base peaks of which would appear at m/z 870 (loss of CO), 869 (loss of Et), or 855 (loss of Pr), respectively, from the main component of 3. The absence of CO loss convincingly proves the unprecedented softness of the LIFDI technology compared with other ionization methods including electrospray ionization (ESI) [13], matrix assisted laser desorption ionization (MALDI), and fast atom bombardment (FAB) [14].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…However, in the case of MALDI-TOF mass-spectral studies these complexes underwent decarbonylation upon laser desorption/ionization [47,48] with the formation of [Pc*Ru] 2 + molecular ions ap-pearing as dominant signals in mass-spectra of tert-butyl and crown-substituted complexes. Their HR-ESI massspectra showed non-fragmented molecular ions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%