Oxford Clinical Psychology 2015
DOI: 10.1093/med:psych/9780198527565.003.0010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of repertory grids in clinical practice

Abstract: This chapter’s main aim is to provide an account of some of the forms of analysis of repertory grid data, illustrating strengths, weaknesses and appropriate use of the various methods currently available and commenting on the pitfalls of inappropriate analysis. A detailed analysis is presented of repertory grids completed by a client at various stages of group therapy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The discrepancy between actual and ideal selves (element pair 1) is used as a proxy measure of self‐esteem (Leach, Freshwater, Aldridge & Sunderland, ). It is therefore equally a measure of interest for the present study, together with a similar measure of ‘professional self‐esteem’ (element pair 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discrepancy between actual and ideal selves (element pair 1) is used as a proxy measure of self‐esteem (Leach, Freshwater, Aldridge & Sunderland, ). It is therefore equally a measure of interest for the present study, together with a similar measure of ‘professional self‐esteem’ (element pair 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This limits participant engagement, empowerment and collaborative working. Notwithstanding, the use of the RGT as a clinical and research tool is well-established (i.e., Blagden, Winder, Gregson and Thorne, 2014;Faccio, Castiglioni and Bell, 2012;Leach, Freshwater, Aldridge and Sunderland, 2001;Mason, 2008;Turpin, Dallos, Owen and Thomas, 2009;Winter, 2003). Originally used in clinical practice (Winter, 1992), it can differ greatly from objective and projective forensic psychology assessments (Horley, 2008).…”
Section: The Rgtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ The practitioner and participant should give ample time and attention to this step. This is because the unique completed grid exposes the fundamental template of one's construing; it represents the distinctions made between significant people on the topic and have been likened to schemas (Leach et al, 2001). Essentially, the elements provide context to the topic of focus, whilst the elicitation of constructs provides insight into how the participant construes their interpersonal world, and the rating process tells of how the participant is thinking in terms of linking topic and elements by 12 constructs/ values (see Jankowicz, 2004).…”
Section: Collaborative Eyeball Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…suggesting that they are aware of how difficult it may be to distance themselves from the 'sex offender' label. A principal component analysis (PCA) of the repertory grids offers further insight in to the underlying participants' experience during their time on the prison part of the circle (Leach, Freshwater, Aldridge, & Sunderland, 2001;. A PCA provides a graphical output of an individual's construal system, which shows the internal relationship between the people important in the participant's world (elements represented as points) and the way they understand and construe them (constructs represented as lines from the origin) (Jankowicz, 2004).…”
Section: 'I'll Never Be Truly Free'mentioning
confidence: 99%