2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.04.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of rationality of coal-based synthetic natural gas (SNG) production in China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So, under this CO 2 capture rate, the cost of the SNG production with CCS would increase by 0.093 US$/m 3 . It accounts for 48% of the cost of the SNG production without CCS, 0.195 US$/ m 3 (Li et al, 2014a). This additional cost will reduce dramatically the profitability of the SNG plants.…”
Section: Ghgs Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…So, under this CO 2 capture rate, the cost of the SNG production with CCS would increase by 0.093 US$/m 3 . It accounts for 48% of the cost of the SNG production without CCS, 0.195 US$/ m 3 (Li et al, 2014a). This additional cost will reduce dramatically the profitability of the SNG plants.…”
Section: Ghgs Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This amount of heat could approximately satisfy the heat needed by a house of 250 m 2 within 24 h. For heat generation process, the energy efficiency of SNG-fired boilers is set as 85% while that of coal-fired boilers is set as 70% based on the authoritative monitor data collected by State Administration for Quality Supervision and Inspection and Quarantine (Li et al, 2014a). The lower heating value of the SNG is 34.61 MJ/m 3 and that of the hard coal is 20.91 MJ/kg.…”
Section: System Boundaries and Functional Unitmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The EF j values of the GHG profile for each lifecycle stage of CSG are present in Table 4, which are collected from the existing academic literature, including Skone and Littlefield (2013) and Su et al (2015). The ECF j values in Table 5 are taken from Li et al (2014). According to Kong et al (2016a), the Chinese energy intensity by GDP was 1.898 MJ/yuan in 2015, which was adjusted based on constant 2010 prices.…”
Section: Eni For the Csg Life Cyclementioning
confidence: 99%