2013
DOI: 10.1175/jcli-d-12-00228.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Permafrost Thermal Dynamics and Response to Climate Change in the CMIP5 Earth System Models

Abstract: We analyze global climate model predictions of soil temperature (from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 5 (CMIP5) database) to assess the models' representation of currentclimate soil thermal dynamics, and their predictions of permafrost thaw during the 21 st century. We compare the models' predictions to observations of active layer thickness, air temperature, and soil temperature, and to theoretically-expected relationships between active layer thickness and air temperature annual mean and seasonal c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
436
1
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 388 publications
(462 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
18
436
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For strong carbon loss, deeper permafrost carbon (∼10 m) is much more vulnerable to decomposition on warming. Because the processes controlling the rate and extent of deep permafrost thaw are highly uncertain, models cannot project the timing or magnitude of permafrost carbon release accurately (19,25,26). Therefore, CO 2 observing strategies designed to monitor changes in Arctic respiration patterns will be needed to avoid the risk of emerging permafrost carbon sources going undetected.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For strong carbon loss, deeper permafrost carbon (∼10 m) is much more vulnerable to decomposition on warming. Because the processes controlling the rate and extent of deep permafrost thaw are highly uncertain, models cannot project the timing or magnitude of permafrost carbon release accurately (19,25,26). Therefore, CO 2 observing strategies designed to monitor changes in Arctic respiration patterns will be needed to avoid the risk of emerging permafrost carbon sources going undetected.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparing this to performance of other models (Levavasseur et al, 2011), the PI(eq) total permafrost area is closer to Zhang et al (2000) estimates, but it must be kept in mind that for CLIMBER-2P the area was tuned to be in agreement with a mean estimate from Zhang et al (2000). The PI(tr) total permafrost area is higher by around 4 × 10 6 km 2 compared to the PI(eq).…”
Section: Permafrost Areal Coverage and Spatial Distributionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…These settings were identified by adjusting the sigmoid function to obtain total permafrost area values at the PI(eq) simulation similar to the Zhang et al (2000) areal estimates of permafrost and to maximise the difference in area between the PI(eq) and LGM(eq) simulations permafrost extent. More complex models underestimate permafrost extent at LGM (Levavasseur et al, 2011;Saito et al, 2013) quite significantly, and so by maximising the difference between PI and LGM permafrost, we reduce the underestimate as far as possible for LGM permafrost extent. Figure 11.…”
Section: Permafrost Extent Tuningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Brief information about the eight climate models is provided in Table 1, and additional details regarding the CMIP5 simulation are available in Taylor et al (2012). These data have been widely used to diagnose changes in permafrost in response to climate change in the future (Koven et al 2013;Slater and Lawrence 2013).…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%