2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2004.02.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of PEG 400 and 4000 in urine for gut permeability assessment using solid phase extraction and gel permeation chromatography with refractometric detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 1 In the current study, both the PEG probes and the sugar probes are expressed as urinary ratios and as single probe excretion rates. PEG probes are not commonly expressed as excretion ratios, 28 , 29 and since the excretion of all three PEG probes increased after indomethacin consumption, the increase in urinary PEG ratios was not very pronounced in this study. Only the PEG 3350/PEG 400 ratio could detect increased gastrointestinal permeability after indomethacin use with accurate sensitivity and specificity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“… 1 In the current study, both the PEG probes and the sugar probes are expressed as urinary ratios and as single probe excretion rates. PEG probes are not commonly expressed as excretion ratios, 28 , 29 and since the excretion of all three PEG probes increased after indomethacin consumption, the increase in urinary PEG ratios was not very pronounced in this study. Only the PEG 3350/PEG 400 ratio could detect increased gastrointestinal permeability after indomethacin use with accurate sensitivity and specificity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…First, PEG is safe and easy to handle. Second, these polymers cover a wide range of molecular sizes, including those of macromolecules, and last, their chromatographic determination is unaffected by the presence of sugars found in food and urine, and subjects are not required to adapt their diet prior to taking the test 31. PEG has been criticized for not being sufficiently sensitive to assess intestinal permeability in some of the more subtle disorders of barrier function due to the low urine excretion levels of PEG 400 32.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, these polymers cover a wide range of molecular sizes, including those of macromolecules, and last, their chromatographic determination is unaffected by the presence of sugars found in food and urine, and subjects are not required to adapt their diet prior to taking the test. 31 PEG has been criticized for not being sufficiently sensitive to assess intestinal permeability in some of the more subtle disorders of barrier function due to the low urine excretion levels of PEG 400. 32 However, our results of intestinal permeability for the normal subjects are in agreement with those of a previous study, 31 and when we checked the intestinal permeability twice for the same subject, we found that this method gave very similar results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The simultaneous use of two test marker compounds allows the expression of global intestinal permeability as an index reflecting the transfer value of the less permeable test marker (PEG 3350) relative to the most diffusible probe (PEG 400). Since pre-absorption factors such as gastric emptying, dilution by digestive secretions and post-absorption factors such as systemic distribution and renal clearance are assumed to affect both molecules equally, the value of this index should then be directly comparable from one individual to another [30] . It has been suggested that intestinal permeability markers pass through either a transcellular or a paracellular pathway.…”
Section: Cirrhotics Without Ascites (N = 27)mentioning
confidence: 99%