1994
DOI: 10.1049/ip-map:19941545
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of offset dual-patch microstrip antenna

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it suffers from the narrow impedance bandwidth. The feeding methods that have been reported in connection with stacked patched are coaxial probe [2], [3] and strip line through an aperture [4], [5].The disadvantage of a coaxial feed is that the patch and surrounding material must be physically drilled and soldered at the feed point. The disadvantage of aperture coupling is the relatively high back lobe radiation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it suffers from the narrow impedance bandwidth. The feeding methods that have been reported in connection with stacked patched are coaxial probe [2], [3] and strip line through an aperture [4], [5].The disadvantage of a coaxial feed is that the patch and surrounding material must be physically drilled and soldered at the feed point. The disadvantage of aperture coupling is the relatively high back lobe radiation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Offset dual-and tri-patch configurations are studied in [13]- [15] for broadband operation. However, in this paper, a closer look at the polarization is given for the off-centered dual and triple stacked rings, and a detailed study is conducted to understand the effects of substrate parameters on their resonances in Section II.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A popular method is the use of parasitic patches, either in another layer (stacked geometry) [4] or in the same layer (coplanar geometry). However, the stacked geometry has the disadvantage of increasing the thickness of the antenna, and the coplanar geometry has the disadvantage of increasing the lateral size of the antenna [5]. Most microstrip-fed structures of the printed slot antenna have been used by making the microstrip-fed structures [5] across the center of slot [7], [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the stacked geometry has the disadvantage of increasing the thickness of the antenna, and the coplanar geometry has the disadvantage of increasing the lateral size of the antenna [5]. Most microstrip-fed structures of the printed slot antenna have been used by making the microstrip-fed structures [5] across the center of slot [7], [8]. The conventional center-fed transverse slot antennas have a large value of radiation impedance, so that it is very difficult to match in practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%