2013
DOI: 10.1097/ijg.0b013e318255bb4a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Normal Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness by Age, Sex, and Race Using Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography

Abstract: The thickest RNFL measurements were found in the inferior quadrant, followed by the superior, nasal, and temporal quadrants (ISNT rule applied to the RNFL). Thinner RNFL measurements were associated with older age and increasing myopia. Caucasians tend to have thinner RNFL values when compared with Hispanics and Asians. SD-OCT analysis of the normal RNFL showed results similar to time domain OCT studies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
176
7
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 239 publications
(205 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
18
176
7
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present research, a statistically meaningful negative correlation was demonstrated between the global mean peripapillary RNFL thickness and age, which has been reported before in various studies (15,16). Yet no significant difference was observed between the two age groups and two sex groups in the present study, which suggested that age and sex may not affect macular retinal thickness and RNFL thickness.…”
Section: Comparisons Between Se Groups (P-value) --------------------supporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the present research, a statistically meaningful negative correlation was demonstrated between the global mean peripapillary RNFL thickness and age, which has been reported before in various studies (15,16). Yet no significant difference was observed between the two age groups and two sex groups in the present study, which suggested that age and sex may not affect macular retinal thickness and RNFL thickness.…”
Section: Comparisons Between Se Groups (P-value) --------------------supporting
confidence: 67%
“…From the present results, it may be proposed that the global RNFL thickness has a linear increase with the increase of SE. This trend may explain why the average global RNFL thickness in the present study (100.08 µm) was thinner than 102 µm obtained in a study by Zhao et al (15), but close to 100.7 µm obtained in a study by Alasil et al (16). All three studies were concerned with Asian individuals.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 39%
“…Refractive error and age at examination are some of the well-known confounding factors in the interpretation of peripapillary RNFL thickness. [32][33][34][35][36][37][38] In addition, we performed correlation analysis between various baseline factors and peripapillary RNFL thicknesses in multiple sectors separately. As there was a difference in the pattern of RNFL distribution according to different sectors, it would be more accurate to analyze RNFL thickness in each sector separately.…”
Section: Variablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The control participants were race, age and gender matched to the participants with keratoconus. Study participants were aged between 18 years and 33 years to minimise the effect of age on RNFL thickness, as previous studies 30, 31 have reported a decrease in RNFL thickness with increasing age.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%