The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2018
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1649493
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Minimally Invasive Left Thoracotomy HVAD Implantation – A Single-Center Experience

Abstract: The minimally invasive approach is a viable alternative with the possibility to reduce complications and should be particularly considered for bridge-to-transplant patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, LIS-LVAD implantation has been introduced for patients undergoing LVAD implantation, and this approach would gradually become the standard for patients who have no other concomitant heart diseases necessitating full median sternotomy. [19][20][21][22] The minimal invasiveness of the LIS-LVAD implantation procedure might yield better clinical outcomes, for example, lower transfusion rate, shorter cardiopulmonary bypass time, and lower perioperative mortality. 19,23 Recent research works presented the positive outcomes for avoiding right ventricular dilatation in LIS-LVAD implantation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, LIS-LVAD implantation has been introduced for patients undergoing LVAD implantation, and this approach would gradually become the standard for patients who have no other concomitant heart diseases necessitating full median sternotomy. [19][20][21][22] The minimal invasiveness of the LIS-LVAD implantation procedure might yield better clinical outcomes, for example, lower transfusion rate, shorter cardiopulmonary bypass time, and lower perioperative mortality. 19,23 Recent research works presented the positive outcomes for avoiding right ventricular dilatation in LIS-LVAD implantation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initial limited single-center analyses corroborated noninferiority of the less invasive pump implantation (1,2). Consequently, encouraging clinical outcomes were demonstrated in the multicenter, prospective, nonrandomized LATERAL trial with 144 patients using the HeartWare Ventricular Assist System (HVAD) (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) significantly outperforming the historical sternotomy access performance goal (3).…”
Section: Clinical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A protective effect on right ventricular function by maintaining a physiological pericardial restraint is broadly discussed. Nonetheless, a need for temporary RV support has been reported for the aforementioned surgical strategy (2). Ultimately, the authors consider the most prominent advantage in previous sternotomy implants by mitigating adhesion-related injury and bleeding to heart structures (5).…”
Section: Advantagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thirteen retrospective cohort studies published between 2014 and 2020 met the eligibility criteria and were included in the analysis (Table 1 [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] ). A PRISMA flow diagram of the literature search is provided as Figure 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%