2010
DOI: 10.1179/030192309x12506804200942
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of metal mould heat transfer coefficients during continuous casting of steel

Abstract: Heat transfer coefficients in the mould were determined by the inverse method and they are related to both process conditions and carbon equivalents of steels. Experimental data were obtained from an industrial plant by temperatures measured in moulds of the continuous casting machine by thermocouples placed in the mould wall in known positions. The temperatures are compared to profiles of simulations by the numerical model of both solidification and heat transfer processes previously examined. As a result, th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
17
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(26 reference statements)
3
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9, the thermocouple TC3 recorded the highest temperature, indicating that the meniscus level is deeper than those observed for the 180 and 240 molds. This behavior is in agreement with findings of previous studies which show that heat transfer is higher for medium and high carbon steels when compared with low carbon steel, and that the maximum heat flux values in the meniscus region are due to the best thermal contact between the liquid metal and the mold wall [23,40,41].…”
Section: Mold Temperaturessupporting
confidence: 92%
“…9, the thermocouple TC3 recorded the highest temperature, indicating that the meniscus level is deeper than those observed for the 180 and 240 molds. This behavior is in agreement with findings of previous studies which show that heat transfer is higher for medium and high carbon steels when compared with low carbon steel, and that the maximum heat flux values in the meniscus region are due to the best thermal contact between the liquid metal and the mold wall [23,40,41].…”
Section: Mold Temperaturessupporting
confidence: 92%
“…On the basis of the aforementioned issues, it can be concluded that the solution of more complex 3‐D transient problems does not necessarily mean obtaining better results. Even today, several researchers are still conducting studies based on 1‐D pseudo‐transient models in order to analyze more specific issues regarding the CC process, such as: the convective heat transfer at the solid–liquid interface, and the convective coefficient for the Robin cooling condition through the solution of a mold‐slab coupled heat transfer problem . On the other hand, in the longitudinal section approach, the domain analysis implies explicitly the whole region of interest from the meniscus until the mold outlet, which results in a more accurate computation of boundary conditions and material properties .…”
Section: Solution Of the Efg Formulation For The CC Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the EFG solution presented in this work requires just 1st order differentiable shape functions and provides greater accuracy in computing the material properties at any domain position (not just at the nodal positions), since it has been formulated to solve the weak‐form presented at the integral Equation 15. The CC slab heat transfer model has been solved under the following assumptions: (i) An Eulerian Description is employed over the slab longitudinal thickness to solve the 2‐D heat transfer equation; (ii) The solution is acceptable for most of the slab wide face excluding the areas closest to the corners; (iii) There is not Newman heat flux q 0 condition on the boundaries but just a cooling Robin condition; (iv) The material properties and the cooling Robin condition exhibit a significant temperature dependence (nonlinear aspect); (v) Increased heat transport in the liquid core due to convection is taken into account by an effective thermal conductivity as proposed by Zhang et al; (vi) The temperature at the meniscus is uniform and assumed to be equal to the casting temperature; and (vii) The top and bottom surfaces of the mold are considered to be adiabatic, and heat absorption by the mold powder above the meniscus is negligible. The physical and transport properties are computed considering a Phase‐Fraction Model: k=kαfα+kγfγ+kδfδ+knormallfnormall Cp=Cpαfα+Cpγfγ+Cpδfδ+Cplfl ρ=ραfα+ργfγ+ρδfδ+ρnormallfnormall …”
Section: Solution Of the Efg Formulation For The CC Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the main physical phenomena source that affects the continuous casting is the heat transfer in all three regions. For instance, irregularities in the cooling process at the boundaries of the mold may induce an uneven solid ingot shell, which can produce breakpoints at the mold exit or crack formation [1,5,8,10,11]. These problems directly influence the quality and cost of production.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%