2015
DOI: 10.1002/lary.25790
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of laryngoscopic features in patients with unilateral vocal fold paresis

Abstract: 4 Laryngoscope, 126:1831-1836, 2016.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6 In a 2013 study of stroboscopic examinations reviewed by otolaryngology residents with training on the concept of the interarytenoid spatial relationship, this factor positively predicted unilateral adductor thyroarytenoid/lateral cricoarytenoid paresis, including sidedness, when compared to LEMG findings. 7 Two recent prospective studies 8,9 also report reduced movement (extent of lateral motion) and reduced kinesis (rapidity of movement) as being significantly associated with paresis in a case series of 19 patients. Certain clinical features were found to be associated with specific sidedness when examined by expert laryngologists, 8 although not with acceptable inter-rater reliability when rated by less experienced trainees.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6 In a 2013 study of stroboscopic examinations reviewed by otolaryngology residents with training on the concept of the interarytenoid spatial relationship, this factor positively predicted unilateral adductor thyroarytenoid/lateral cricoarytenoid paresis, including sidedness, when compared to LEMG findings. 7 Two recent prospective studies 8,9 also report reduced movement (extent of lateral motion) and reduced kinesis (rapidity of movement) as being significantly associated with paresis in a case series of 19 patients. Certain clinical features were found to be associated with specific sidedness when examined by expert laryngologists, 8 although not with acceptable inter-rater reliability when rated by less experienced trainees.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…7 Two recent prospective studies 8,9 also report reduced movement (extent of lateral motion) and reduced kinesis (rapidity of movement) as being significantly associated with paresis in a case series of 19 patients. Certain clinical features were found to be associated with specific sidedness when examined by expert laryngologists, 8 although not with acceptable inter-rater reliability when rated by less experienced trainees. 9 In the current study, VF degeneration, glottic insufficiency, and mucosal wave anomalies were considered highly compelling in diagnosis of paresis, though not to the degree of motion anomalies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Findings on VLS depend on the degree of neurological impairment, the affected muscle or muscles, and the relative compensation from the unaffected muscles . Therefore, VLS findings are not specific and may include asymmetries in gross motion, glottal configuration, and mucosal wave formation during phonation . Furthermore, the distinction among neurological impairment, functional or behavioral disorder, and innocent laryngeal asymmetry on VLS is not straightforward …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…fold bowing (especially in a patient <50 years old), decreased abduction or adduction, axial tilt of the larynx, vertical height mismatch, phase lag, and asymmetric mucosal wave amplitudes and frequencies [1,3,4…”
Section: Key Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the term 'paresis' for the purposes of this discussion denotes the preservation of some degree of mobility, thereby making it a discrete clinical entity from paralysis [1,3]. As such, the diagnosis of paresis becomes one that is attained either on visual inspection (endoscopy or stroboscopy) or in conjunction with neurodiagnostic testing [laryngeal electromyography (LEMG)] [4,5 && ,6 & ] (Fig. 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%