2021
DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/640/6/062007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of kinetic and equilibrium adsorption of heavy metals by natural materials

Abstract: One of the effective methods of cleaning up water is an adsorption method. The adsorption treatment is effectively used as a post-treatment after using treatment chemicals precipitators. You can use natural porous carbon-containing materials as obtained sorbents, as industrial waste, or cheap carbon raw modified by humans: ash, fines coconut, peat, activated carbon, active clay, bio- and phyto-sorbents, agricultural wastes (rice, barley, wheat husk, nutshells, bagasse, etc.). In this regard, there is a questio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where R is the universal gas constant (8.314 J mol −1 K −1 ), T is the temperature in Kelvin and K c is the equilibrium/rate constant calculated as the surface and solution metal distribution ratio. The negative values of G o indicate the spontaneous nature of the adsorption process (Salishcheva et al., 2021). However, the negative value of G o decreases with an increase in temperature, which indicates that the spontaneous nature of adsorption was inversely proportional to the temperature (Kumar et al., 2018; Sahmoune, 2019).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where R is the universal gas constant (8.314 J mol −1 K −1 ), T is the temperature in Kelvin and K c is the equilibrium/rate constant calculated as the surface and solution metal distribution ratio. The negative values of G o indicate the spontaneous nature of the adsorption process (Salishcheva et al., 2021). However, the negative value of G o decreases with an increase in temperature, which indicates that the spontaneous nature of adsorption was inversely proportional to the temperature (Kumar et al., 2018; Sahmoune, 2019).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The different type of trend for chromium was observed at fixed bed height of 36 cm (150 g) and different volumetric flow rates of 10, 20, and 30 ml/min [22][23].The more % removal was observed for industrial samples having 96.2%, 72.63%, and 81.77% in comparison with synthetic effluents having 98.8%, 87.91%, and 98.71% which was due to the presence of other heavy metals, sludges apart from competitive adsorption of chromium present in the industrial effluent [24][25].Overall in comparison with industrial effluents for iron, the synthetic solutions have proved to be more superior in terms of total % removal and better performance was observed with synthetic solutions rather than industrial effluents for iron as shown in Tables 3 and 4 respectively. For a similar comparison studies with chromium, the industrial effluents proved to be more percentage removal as compared to synthetic solutions [23][24][25].…”
Section: Effect Of Bed Height and Adsorbent Dosage On The Removal Of Cr (Iii) And Fe (Ii) From Industrial Effluentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adsorption is considered to be one of the rather cheap and simple techniques to apply not only in the purification processes of various aqueous systems but also in hydrometallurgy [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25], including rare earth element (REE) technology [26][27][28]. In recent years, the creation of sorbents based on waste materials, in particular those of plant nature, has represented a broad independent research direction [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43]. However, as noted by Anastopoulos et al in their paper [27], there are practically no review materials on REEs adsorption by biosorbents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%