2013
DOI: 10.1094/pdis-05-12-0508-re
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Incidence–Severity Relationships for Strawberry Powdery Mildew as Influenced by Cultivar, Cultivar Type, and Production Systems

Abstract: Carisse, O., Lefebvre, A., Van der Heyden, H., Roberge, L., and Brodeur, L. 2013. Analysis of incidence-severity relationships for strawberry powdery mildew as influenced by cultivar, cultivar type, and production systems. Plant Dis. 97:354-362.The relationships between strawberry powdery mildew incidence (I) and severity (S) were investigated for various cultivars, for Junebearing and day-neutral cultivars, and for production systems (openfield and plastic-tunnel) with the objective of deriving a simple relat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on this analysis, when disease incidence ranged from 0.25 to 0.50, the predicted ACC values ranged from 16.1 to 63.8 conidia/m\ respectively. Considering that an action threshold for fungicide application of 5% leaf area diseased, which corresponds to disease incidence of 0.35 (5), was suggested to avoid damage to berries (6), we selected ACC thresholds of 50 and 100 conidia/m"*, which could be considered as warning and action threshold for postharvest treatments, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on this analysis, when disease incidence ranged from 0.25 to 0.50, the predicted ACC values ranged from 16.1 to 63.8 conidia/m\ respectively. Considering that an action threshold for fungicide application of 5% leaf area diseased, which corresponds to disease incidence of 0.35 (5), was suggested to avoid damage to berries (6), we selected ACC thresholds of 50 and 100 conidia/m"*, which could be considered as warning and action threshold for postharvest treatments, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…because their fruits are produced over a long period (9), generally from mid-July to the end of September (which is when epidemics are generally severe), as well as in strawberry plants grown under plastic tunnels, because the weather conditions in tunnels are generally favorable to disease development (5,22,26). The disease also causes indirect losses through leaf infection by reducing the photosynthetic potential of leaves and, hence, reducing plant vigor.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the RGB map mosaicked from UAV data had a ground resolution of 6 cm, which made it possible distinguish canopy from background components and assess disease severity (DS) and disease incidence (DI) for every vineyard quickly. DS indicates the severity of the disease, and DI was the proportion of diseased rows in a plot [40,41]. A value 0 was used to represent no incidence and 1 was used to represent incidence.…”
Section: Study Site and Field Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These datasets can also feed back into an enhanced understanding of modified varieties' real-world performance in relation to microclimates, mycorrhizal fungi, pests and diseases (Camprubi et al 2007;Xu et al 2012). Powdery mildew infection risk, for example, is likely to be predictable using environmental data (Carisse et al 2013). In the case of this strawberry variety, Malling Centenary, RH was the strongest predictor of field yields and phenology.…”
Section: 5 Agronomic Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%