Analysis of German nutrition brochures for pregnant women with evidence-based patient information criteria

Gaudry, Daniela Küllenberg de; Grede, Nina; Motschall, Edith; Lins, Sabine

doi:10.1016/j.pec.2014.10.015

Cited by 9 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Among such tools, pamphlets are the most widely cited in the environmental education literature [24,25] because they summarize key elements [25]. However, they are merely informative and are not always adapted [26]. Moreover, pamphlets are overly complex, especially for poor health literacy-level persons.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

How to Educate Pregnant Women about Endocrine Disruptors?

Rouillon

Ouazzani

Hardouin

et al. 2020

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Despite mediatization, only half of pregnant women are informed about endocrine disruptors (EDs). We wished to inquire about appropriate environmental health education procedures during pregnancy: Who, when, and how? Methods: The question stems from a comprehensive population health intervention research project. It includes qualitative studies aimed at constructing an educational program in environmental health and an accompanying assessment tool. The validation of a customized questionnaire (PREVED© for Pregnancy Prevention Endocrine Disruptors) about the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of pregnant women regarding exposure to EDs was carried out in a quantitative study. Results: Health education by a prenatal professional with communication skills should take place as early as possible, during the preconception period or early pregnancy, as part of individual consultation or group workshops. In order to customize the discourse and to develop women’s empowerment, concomitant presentation of the risks by the products used in each room and of previous solutions is recommended. Conclusion: Appropriate health education procedures on EDs should be done at every contact but taking the KAP of pregnant women into account first. We propose all educational actions should be accompanied by questioning of the KAP of pregnant women; for example, with questions from the PREVED© questionnaire.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

How to Educate Pregnant Women about Endocrine Disruptors?

Rouillon

Ouazzani

Hardouin

et al. 2020

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…They provide support for authors and publishers of EBHI by offering quality criteria [6]. Even though the criteria for EBHI have long been defined [7,8], implementation into practice is lacking [9,10]. Interviews with providers of health information revealed shortcomings regarding their competences in evidence-based medicine (EBM) [11].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A blended learning training programme for health information providers to enhance implementation of the Guideline Evidence-based Health Information: development and qualitative pilot study

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background:The Guideline Evidence-based Health Information was published in 2017 and addresses health information providers. The long-term goal of the guideline is to improve the quality of health information. Evidence-based health information represents a prerequisite for informed decision-making. Health information providers lack competences in evidence-based medicine. Therefore, our aim was to develop and pilot-test a blended learning training programme for health information providers to enhance application of the guideline. Methods: Development:We developed the training programme according to the Medical Research Council guidance for developing and evaluating complex interventions. The training programme was planned on the basis of problem-based learning. It aims to impart competences in evidence-based medicine. Furthermore, it comprises the application of criteria for evidence-based health information. Pilot testing:We conducted a qualitative pilot study focusing on the acceptability and feasibility of the training programme. Health information providers were recruited and in-house training sessions were offered. Feasibility and acceptability were explored by structured class observations and in semi-structured focus group interviews with the participants after the training sessions. The transcripts and documentations were analysed using qualitative content analysis according to Mayring. The training was revised iteratively according to the results.

show abstract

“…Although the criteria for EBHI have been defined by national and international working groups for years with the aim of enabling informed decisions, 11 12 the implementation into practice is currently not successful. 13 14 …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

MAPPinfo, mapping quality of health information: study protocol for a validation study of an assessment instrument

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IntroductionHealth information is a prerequisite of informed decision-making. Criteria for development, content and presentation have recently been published in a corresponding guideline. Within a systematic search, 27 relevant checklists were identified, none of them, however, complying with the guideline or providing reasonably operationalised measurement items. Therefore, a draft of a checklist with 19 criteria was drafted. The current study aims at developing and validating this measure of quality.Methods and analysisThe validation design consists of five single studies to be conducted at the University of Halle-Wittenberg/Germany and Graz/Austria. (1) Achieving content validity through expert reviews of the first draft, (2) achieving feasibility using ‘think aloud’ in piloting with untrained users, (3) pretesting the instrument applied to health information materials without use of secondary sources: determining inter-rater reliability and criterion validity, (4) determining construct validity using information on proceedings and methods in the development process provided by the developers and (5) determining divergent validity in comparison with the Ensuring Quality Information for Patients (EQUIP) (expanded) Scale. The substudies will use varying samples of experts, students and developers and will apply the instrument to materials of various domains. Sample sizes will be adjusted to the particular research designs and questions. Analyses will employ qualitative methods, such as content analyses and discourse within the expert panel, and correlation-based methods both for determining inter-rater reliability and validity.Ethics and disseminationThe project is approved by the ethics committee of the Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg (approval number: 2019 115). Results will be published, and the instrument made accessible on public health platforms. It is meant to become a certification standard. MAPPinfo can be used as a screening instrument without training or secondary sources. Although developed in the German language, the instrument will be applicable also in other languages.Trial registration numberAsPredected22546; date of registration: 24 July 2019.Protocol versionJuly 2020.

show abstract

Analysis of German nutrition brochures for pregnant women with evidence-based patient information criteria

Cited by 9 publications

References 13 publications

How to Educate Pregnant Women about Endocrine Disruptors?

How to Educate Pregnant Women about Endocrine Disruptors?

A blended learning training programme for health information providers to enhance implementation of the Guideline Evidence-based Health Information: development and qualitative pilot study

MAPPinfo, mapping quality of health information: study protocol for a validation study of an assessment instrument

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About