2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10535-009-0128-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of genetic variability in two diploid Musa cultivars using RAPD

Abstract: Twenty accessions of the sparsely cultivated diploid Musa cultivars Matti (AA) and Rasakadali (AB) were subjected to random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) assay. A total of 14 random primers were used for the estimation of interand intracultivar variations. Out of 86 bands generated, 64 were polymorphic (74.4 % polymorphism). The cluster analysis grouped the cultivars into two major clusters: cluster I with 10 accessions of Matti and 2 of Rasakadali and cluster II comprising the remaining 8 accessions of Ras… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…RAPD-PCR-based assays are important as a genome-wide DNA variation screening strategy (Padmesh et al, 2009). Toxicant-induced genotoxic effects, DNA variation, DNA damage, genetic instability, and mutagenic effects have been evaluated successfully with RAPD analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RAPD-PCR-based assays are important as a genome-wide DNA variation screening strategy (Padmesh et al, 2009). Toxicant-induced genotoxic effects, DNA variation, DNA damage, genetic instability, and mutagenic effects have been evaluated successfully with RAPD analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few fragmented populations distributed in a small geographical region entails an urgent reassessment of the threat category of this species for which we have employed RAPD as tool for estimation of genetic variation in samples collected from few locations across the region. RAPD as a cost effective DNA marker system has been successfully employed to detect varia-tion at the inter-specific [17][18][19], intraspecific [20], intervarietal [21], intergeneric genome analysis [22] and at the cultivar levels [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%