2002
DOI: 10.1002/jnr.10105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of gene expression in the rat hippocampus using real time PCR reveals high inter‐individual variation in mRNA expression levels

Abstract: In mammals, gene transcription is a step subjected to tight regulation mechanisms. In fact, changes in mRNA levels in the central nervous system (CNS) can account for numerous phenotypic differences in brain function. We performed a high-resolution analysis of mRNA expression levels for 37 genes selected from a normal rat hippocampus cDNA library. mRNA amounts were quantified using a Real Time PCR SYBR Green assay. We found that, in general, individuals from an inbred rat population (n = 20) have shown 2-3 tim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(19 reference statements)
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is perhaps not surprising, given the observations of inter-individual variation in other molecular parameters (e.g. mRNA levels among inbred rats (Alfonso et al 2002)). Low editing is, however, relatively rare, because of the 42 mice analyzed in the whole brain experiments, only a single animal showed low levels (Table 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…This is perhaps not surprising, given the observations of inter-individual variation in other molecular parameters (e.g. mRNA levels among inbred rats (Alfonso et al 2002)). Low editing is, however, relatively rare, because of the 42 mice analyzed in the whole brain experiments, only a single animal showed low levels (Table 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The data demonstrate that BS mice have a high baseline preference for saccharin solution (face validity) and that this preference is reduced following treatment with the mood stabilizers lithium and valproate but is not affected by the administration of the antidepressant imipramine (predictive validity). Given that high preference for sweet solution was associated with other mania-related behaviors [e.g., increased susceptibility for cocaine and impulsive behaviors (Perry et al, 2007)] and with a number of mechanisms involved in BPD [e.g., the dopaminergic (Muscat and Willner, 1989) and the glutamatergic systems (Alfonso et al, 2002;Duncko et al, 2003)], it is proposed that the model might also possess some initial construct validity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While it is tempting to speculate that the latter observations imply that the mechanism(s) underlying the effect of Li treatment involves factors regulating the disposition and clearance of the TRPC3 protein at the post-translational level, the large variance in the mRNA measures (up to 6-fold) in the comparison groups, which likely reflects intersubject and natural genetic variations in the gene expression, [32][33][34] may have obscured changes in mRNA levels. That said, the variance of the mean differences for the within-subject Li treatment effect was considerably smaller (CV ¼ 160%) than that for the between-subject comparisons (range of CVs ¼ 210-585%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%