Most cellular functions, including signaling by G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), are mediated by protein-protein interactions, making the identification and localization of protein complexes key to the understanding of cellular processes. In complement to traditional biochemical techniques, noninvasive resonance energy transfer (RET) and protein-fragment complementation assays (PCAs) now allow protein interactions to be detected in the context of living cells. In this review, fluorescent and bioluminescent PCAs are discussed and their application illustrated with studies on GPCR signaling. Newly developed techniques combining PCA and RET assays for the detection of ternary and quaternary protein complexes are also presented.The identification and localization of protein-protein interactions is central to the understanding of biological processes such as extracellular signal integration, gene expression regulation, as well as most cellular metabolic pathways. Immunoprecipitation (IP) and pull-down assays have been used extensively to demonstrate protein-protein interactions. Although these techniques remain very useful, they necessitate the disruption of biological samples and the solubilization of membrane proteins, and they generally provide little information on the subcellular localization of the protein complexes (Milligan and Bouvier, 2005). Fluorescence and bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (FRET and BRET), as well as reporter complementation assays, are noninvasive approaches that overcome some limitations of classic biochemical techniques. They allow the examination of proteinprotein interactions in their native context: in living cells or even in living animals. Moreover, information on the subcellular localization of the interaction can be gained with microscopic FRET or bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) analysis.Multiple protein-protein interactions play essential roles in signaling events mediated by GPCRs. Oligomerization between GPCRs is now recognized to modulate the pharmacological characteristics of the receptors and influence their coupling to G proteins (Fuxe et al., 2007;Milligan, 2007;Pin et al., 2007). The interaction between GPCRs and G proteins is also well documented. GPCR activation upon ligand binding induces conformational changes in the receptor structure that promotes a GDP-to-GTP nucleotide exchange to the ␣ subunit of the interacting trimeric G protein. GTP-bound G␣ subunits then dissociate from (or change conformation relative to) the receptor and the /␥ subunits, allowing interactions between G␣ as well as G/␥ with effector proteins (Lambert, 2008). In contrast to early models in which individual components of the system were envisioned as free-