“…Extensive studies have focused on changes in extreme climate events under global climate change (Hirabayashi et al, 2013;Huang et al, 2017;Kharin et al, 2013). Currently, with the 1.5 • C target, the socioeconomic impacts of 1.5 • C global warming on factors, such as population exposed to disasters, need to be further studied.…”
Abstract. The Paris Agreement proposes a 1.5 ∘C target to limit the increase
in global mean temperature (GMT). Studying the population exposure to
droughts under this 1.5 ∘C target will be helpful in guiding new
policies that mitigate and adapt to disaster risks under climate change.
Based on simulations from the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison
Project (ISI-MIP), the Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index
(SPEI) was used to calculate drought frequencies in the reference period
(1986–2005) and 1.5 ∘C global warming scenario (2020–2039 in
RCP2.6). Then population exposure was evaluated by combining drought
frequency with simulated population data from shared socioeconomic pathways
(SSPs). In addition, the relative importance of climate and demographic
change and the cumulative probability of exposure change were analyzed.
Results revealed that population exposure to droughts in the east of China is
higher than that in the west; exposure in the middle and lower reaches of the
Yangtze River region is the highest, and it is lowest in the Qinghai-Tibet
region. An additional 12.89 million people will be exposed to droughts under
the 1.5 ∘C global warming scenario relative to the reference period.
Demographic change is the primary contributor to exposure (79.95 %) in
the 1.5 ∘C global warming scenario, more than climate change
(29.93 %) or the interaction effect (−9.88 %). Of the three drought
intensities – mild, moderate, and extreme – moderate droughts contribute
the most to exposure (63.59 %). Probabilities of increasing or decreasing
total drought frequency are roughly equal (49.86 % and 49.66 %,
respectively), while the frequency of extreme drought is likely to decrease
(71.83 % probability) in the 1.5 ∘C global warming scenario. The
study suggested that reaching the 1.5 ∘C target is a potential way
for mitigating the impact of climate change on both drought hazard and
population exposure.
“…Extensive studies have focused on changes in extreme climate events under global climate change (Hirabayashi et al, 2013;Huang et al, 2017;Kharin et al, 2013). Currently, with the 1.5 • C target, the socioeconomic impacts of 1.5 • C global warming on factors, such as population exposed to disasters, need to be further studied.…”
Abstract. The Paris Agreement proposes a 1.5 ∘C target to limit the increase
in global mean temperature (GMT). Studying the population exposure to
droughts under this 1.5 ∘C target will be helpful in guiding new
policies that mitigate and adapt to disaster risks under climate change.
Based on simulations from the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison
Project (ISI-MIP), the Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index
(SPEI) was used to calculate drought frequencies in the reference period
(1986–2005) and 1.5 ∘C global warming scenario (2020–2039 in
RCP2.6). Then population exposure was evaluated by combining drought
frequency with simulated population data from shared socioeconomic pathways
(SSPs). In addition, the relative importance of climate and demographic
change and the cumulative probability of exposure change were analyzed.
Results revealed that population exposure to droughts in the east of China is
higher than that in the west; exposure in the middle and lower reaches of the
Yangtze River region is the highest, and it is lowest in the Qinghai-Tibet
region. An additional 12.89 million people will be exposed to droughts under
the 1.5 ∘C global warming scenario relative to the reference period.
Demographic change is the primary contributor to exposure (79.95 %) in
the 1.5 ∘C global warming scenario, more than climate change
(29.93 %) or the interaction effect (−9.88 %). Of the three drought
intensities – mild, moderate, and extreme – moderate droughts contribute
the most to exposure (63.59 %). Probabilities of increasing or decreasing
total drought frequency are roughly equal (49.86 % and 49.66 %,
respectively), while the frequency of extreme drought is likely to decrease
(71.83 % probability) in the 1.5 ∘C global warming scenario. The
study suggested that reaching the 1.5 ∘C target is a potential way
for mitigating the impact of climate change on both drought hazard and
population exposure.
“…SPEI estimation requires monthly water deficit (MWD), that is, the difference of monthly precipitation (P) and monthly potential evapotranspiration (PET). Hargreaves (Rhee et al, 2016;Dibike et al, 2017;Oguntunde et al, 2017;Spinoni et al, 2018), Thornthwaite (Törnros and Menzel, 2014;Smirnov et al, 2016;Wu et al, 2016;Bonsal et al, 2017;Chen and Sun, 2017;Feng et al, 2017;Khan et al, 2017), and Penman-Monteith (Wang et al, 2014;Feng et al, 2017;Gao et al, 2017;Huang et al, 2018;Zhang et al, 2018) are the three most commonly used PET estimation methods employed in SPEI based drought studies under projected scenarios. Penman-Monteith method is the best reported method and data intensive, Hargreaves method utilizes daily maximum and minimum temperature whereas Thonthwaite requires monthly mean temperature.…”
The study evaluates the drought characteristics in India over projected climatic scenarios in different time frames, that is, near‐future (2010–2039), mid‐future (2040–2069), and far‐future (2070–2099) in comparison with reference period (1976–2005). Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI), a multi‐scalar drought index was used owing to its robustness in capturing drought conditions while accounting the temperature. Gridded rainfall and temperature data provided by India Meteorological Department (IMD) was used to perform bias correction of nine Global Climate Models (GCMs) from Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) project. Quantile mapping was used to correct the daily rainfall data at seasonal scale whereas daily temperature data was corrected at monthly scale. Multi‐Model Ensemble (MME) was prepared for different homogeneous monsoon regions of India, namely Hilly Regions (HR), Central Northeast (CNE), Northeast (NE), Northwest (NW), West Central (WC), and Peninsula (PS). Taylor diagram statistics were used for the preparation of MME. The regional climate cycle obtained from MME was found to be in good agreement with observed cycle derived from IMD data. The Mann–Kendal trend test was employed to detect the trend in drought severity and magnitude whereas L‐moments based frequency analysis was used to assess the magnitude of extreme drought severity under different time frames. The study reveals an increasing trend in drought severity, duration, occurrences, and the average length of drought under warming climate scenarios. Furthermore, the area under “above moderate drought” (i.e., severe and extreme drought combined) condition was also found to be increasing in projected climate.
“…The frequency of extreme climatic events will greatly increase for the next 40 years in Northern China, most notably in semi-arid regions [3,4]. There will probably be an enhancement of the drought sensitivity of ecosystems [5], reduction in productivity and biodiversity, and change of vegetation species composition [6][7][8][9].…”
A major disturbance in nature, drought, has a significant impact on the vulnerability and resilience of semi-arid ecosystems by shifting phenology and productivity. However, due to the various disturbance mechanisms, phenology and primary productivity have remained largely ambiguous until now. This paper evaluated the spatio-temporal changes of phenology and productivity based on GIMMS NDVI3g time series data, and demonstrated the responses of vegetation phenology and productivity to drought disturbances with the standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index (SPEI) in semi-arid ecosystems of northern China. The results showed that (1): vegetation phenology exhibited dramatic spatial heterogeneity with different rates, mostly presented in the regions with high chances of land cover type variation. The delayed onset of growing season (SOS) and advanced end of growing season (EOS) occurred in Horqin Sandy Land and the eastern Ordos Plateau with a one to three days/decade (p < 0.05) rate and in the middle and east of Inner Mongolia with a two days/decade rate, respectively. Vegetation productivity presented a clear pattern: south increased and north decreased. (2) Spring drought delayed SOS in grassland, barren/sparsely vegetated land, and cropland, while autumn drought significantly advanced EOS in grassland and barren/sparsely vegetated lands. Annual drought reduced vegetation productivity and the sensitivity of productivity regarding drought disturbance was higher than that of phenology.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.