2009
DOI: 10.1002/hed.21105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of free flap viability based on recipient vein selection

Abstract: In this large cohort of patients, we found no difference in the odds of flap re-exploration or failure based on venous anastomotic configuration. Reconstructive surgeons should have both anastomotic techniques in their repertoire to optimize the success of every flap.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(25 reference statements)
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Flap failure during hospitalization was defined as partial or complete flap death, indicated by vascular compromise and any degree of necrosis after surgery [14]. Coronary artery disease was defined as a history of angina, myocardial infarction, percutaneous coronary intervention, or coronary artery bypass graft surgery.…”
Section: Data Collection and Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flap failure during hospitalization was defined as partial or complete flap death, indicated by vascular compromise and any degree of necrosis after surgery [14]. Coronary artery disease was defined as a history of angina, myocardial infarction, percutaneous coronary intervention, or coronary artery bypass graft surgery.…”
Section: Data Collection and Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No consensus has yet been reached regarding whether to use the internal jugular or the SVS. 15 Most authors reported that each system is equally reliable, 4,[15][16][17][18] while other studies supported that IJVS is the ideal recipient if technically feasible. [19][20][21] Although debates over which system is more adequate are currently in progress (summarized in ►Table 3), each system has its own advantages and disadvantages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerical distribution of recipient veins with their number of venous thromboses were recorded (Table 1). [1][2][3][4][5] The primary outcome was the venous thrombosis rate. Relevant studies were assigned a level of evidence according to the American Society of Plastic Surgeons Evidence Rating Scale for Therapy.…”
Section: External or Internal Jugular Vein? Recipient Vein Selection mentioning
confidence: 99%