2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0020-1383(02)00328-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of fracture gap changes, dynamic and static stability of different osteosynthetic procedures in the femoral neck

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
38
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
38
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Typically, three cancellous lag screws oriented along the femoral neck axis and parallel to each other are placed in an inverted triangle. This configuration is biomechanically superior to any other orientation and decreases the risk of subtrochanteric fracture [36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43]. As demonstrated by Lindequist et al [44••] and other previous authors, the first screw should be placed within 3 mm of the cortical calcar femorale to allow a three-point buttressing effect (with fixation in the dense subcortical femoral head, the calcar, and the lateral femoral cortex of entry) [45].…”
Section: Implant Choicementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Typically, three cancellous lag screws oriented along the femoral neck axis and parallel to each other are placed in an inverted triangle. This configuration is biomechanically superior to any other orientation and decreases the risk of subtrochanteric fracture [36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43]. As demonstrated by Lindequist et al [44••] and other previous authors, the first screw should be placed within 3 mm of the cortical calcar femorale to allow a three-point buttressing effect (with fixation in the dense subcortical femoral head, the calcar, and the lateral femoral cortex of entry) [45].…”
Section: Implant Choicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Baitner et al [37] showed a greater load to failure and less displacement with use of a sliding hip screw compared to cannulated screws. Bonnaire and Weber [39] compared sliding hip screw fixation with or without a derotational screw with cancellous screws and a fixed angle blade plate in a cadaveric study to evaluate fixation in Pauwels Type III fractures. They demonstrated biomechanical superiority of the sliding hip screw with the derotational screw and recommend its use for high angle femoral neck fractures.…”
Section: Implant Choicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 Derotation screws can be used to enhance stability. 22 In a study of intertrochanteric abduction osteotomy for un-united femoral neck fractures, 43 (86%) of 50 patients achieved bone union after a mean of 3.6 (range, 2-8) months, with a mean Harris hip score of 91. 9 The remaining 7 (14%) patients underwent total hip replacement, 3 for persistent non-union, 3 for severe collapse of the femoral head, and one for a broken implant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and Rinaldi reports 81 -89 % excellent to good results. 27,28 Several biomechanical studies 29,30 have evaluated different implants for managing Pauwels' Type III femoral neck fractures. Baitner et al 29 compared multiple screws to the DHS for treatment of Pauwels' Type III femoral neck fracture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found that the DHS had less inferior femoral head displacement, less shearing displacement and a greater load to failure when compared to the three cannulated cancellous screws. Bonnaire and Weber 30 looked at four different methods of fixation (DHS with derotational screw, DHS without derotational screw, cancellous screws and a 130 degrees angled blade plate) for Pauwels' Type III cadaveric femoral neck fractures. They concluded that the DHS with the derotational screw is the best implant for this fracture pattern.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%