2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2012.04.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of fluoxetine and norfluoxetine in human plasma by liquid-phase microextraction and injection port derivatization GC–MS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The techniques perform high sensitivity and provide well separation. However, majority specimens are subjected to different preparation methods prior to analysis [20][21][22][23][24]. It is usually time consuming and labor intensive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The techniques perform high sensitivity and provide well separation. However, majority specimens are subjected to different preparation methods prior to analysis [20][21][22][23][24]. It is usually time consuming and labor intensive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The drug, marketed as fluoxetine hydrochloride, has a recommended daily dosage ranging from 20 to 80 mg day −1 , and its therapeutic effect can be observed after 2–3 weeks of initiation of treatment. In general, the maximum plasma concentrations occur within 6–8 h after drug intake, typically ranging from 30 to 500 ng mL −1 (Baumann, ; Oliveira, Figueiredo, & Santos‐Neto, ). Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) applies quantitation in serum or plasma for dose optimization, which is given by the sum of the drug concentration with its active metabolites that also contribute to the overall clinical effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, developing a very sensitive analytical method for the determination of FLX is of great importance (4). Several methods have been reported for the quantitation of FLX in various samples including capillary electrophoresis (5), nuclear magnetic resonance spectrometry (6), chromatography (7)(8)(9), chromatography-mass spectrometry (4,10,11), electrochemical methods (12,13), spectrophotometry (14)(15)(16) and spectrofluorimetry (2,17,18). Many of these methods have some major drawbacks such as lack of selectivity, tedious extraction procedures and time-consuming procedures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%