2005
DOI: 10.1159/000086842
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Fingernails and Urine as Biomarkers of Fluoride Exposure from Dentifrice and Varnish in 4- to 7-Year-Old Children

Abstract: The use of fingernails and urine as biomarkers of exposure to fluoride (F) from fluoridated dentifrice and varnish was evaluated in twenty 4- to 7-year-old children, who were divided into two groups: group A (9 caries-free children) and group B (11 children with past caries experience). They used a placebo dentifrice for 28 days, fluoridated dentifrice (1,570 ppm F) for the following 28 days, and placebo dentifrice for an additional 28 days, then returned to their usual dentifrices. Group B children also recei… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
36
0
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
5
36
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…
toenails, together with their faster growth rate, as well as the fact that toenails are less prone to environmental contamination, our data suggest that big toenails are more suitable biomarkers of fl uoride intake.
Copyright © 2006 S. Karger AG, BaselThe increase in the incidence and prevalence of dental fl uorosis observed in the last decades has prompted many studies aiming to monitor fl uoride intake, mainly in children at the age of risk for development of dental fl uorosis [Levy et al, 2003;Martinez-Mier et al, 2003;Paiva et al, 2003;Ramires et al, 2004;Pessan et al, 2005]. Water fl uoridation, the resulting use of fl uoridated water for the processing and preparation of foods and beverages and the introduction of a variety of fl uoride-containing dental products have resulted in a signifi cant increase in the amount of fl uoride in the environment [Ophaug, 1994].
…”
mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…
toenails, together with their faster growth rate, as well as the fact that toenails are less prone to environmental contamination, our data suggest that big toenails are more suitable biomarkers of fl uoride intake.
Copyright © 2006 S. Karger AG, BaselThe increase in the incidence and prevalence of dental fl uorosis observed in the last decades has prompted many studies aiming to monitor fl uoride intake, mainly in children at the age of risk for development of dental fl uorosis [Levy et al, 2003;Martinez-Mier et al, 2003;Paiva et al, 2003;Ramires et al, 2004;Pessan et al, 2005]. Water fl uoridation, the resulting use of fl uoridated water for the processing and preparation of foods and beverages and the introduction of a variety of fl uoride-containing dental products have resulted in a signifi cant increase in the amount of fl uoride in the environment [Ophaug, 1994].
…”
mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Additionally, fluoride might have systemic toxic effects in other tissues when ingested in levels higher than optimal (Buzalaf et al, 2004;Buzalaf et al, 2005;Leite et al, 2008;Kobayashi et al, 2009). Plasma is an important indicator of fluoride levels in the body in both acute (Buzalaf et al, 2004;Pessan et al, 2005) and chronic (Carvalho et al, 2006) exposures. The results of this study were in agreement with previous studies that demonstrated an increase of fluoride concentration in the plasma due to the increase in the chronic intake of fluoride (Carvalho et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, data available in the literature are conflicting about their use to estimate the effect of F intake during toothbrushing (8)(9)(10)(11).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, such increase was not found in all children and fluctuations were observed over time. In another study, using the same protocol, fingernails did not have sensitivity to detect F exposure from dentifrice or F varnish (9). No significant increase of F concentration in fingernails was observed in adults who ingested 1.8 mg F for 30 days either, but surprisingly the authors concluded that fingernails could be considered a biomarker for F based on two nails clippings that were within the 95% confidence interval calculated (10).…”
Section: Fingernail May Not Be a Reliable Biomarker Of Fluoride Body mentioning
confidence: 93%