2018
DOI: 10.3390/su10124744
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Evolution Mechanism and Optimal Reward-Penalty Mechanism for Collection Strategies in Reverse Supply Chains: The Case of Waste Mobile Phones in China

Abstract: The aim of this paper is to discuss the coopetition (cooperative competition) relationship between a manufacturer and a collector in the collection of waste mobile phones (WMPs) and examine the evolution mechanism and the internal reward-penalty mechanism (RPM) for their collection strategies. A coopetition evolutionary game model based on evolutionary game theory was developed to obtain their common and evolutional collection strategies. The pure-strategy Nash equilibriums of this model were obtained which sh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
(62 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many forms of coopetition in this largest emerging market such as the supply chains (Kim et al, 2013), multi-national companies (Luo, 2007b), joint ventures (Shu et al, 2017) and industrial clusters (Fernandez et al, 2016) have attracted researchers' attention. For instance, prior studies of inter-firm coopetition have observed game theory processes (Ding et al, 2018) and criticized the institutional environment (Froese et al, 2019). To enrich the literature, this study aims to establish a concise framework that can be widely used in the Chinese environment considering its Eastern cultural background.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many forms of coopetition in this largest emerging market such as the supply chains (Kim et al, 2013), multi-national companies (Luo, 2007b), joint ventures (Shu et al, 2017) and industrial clusters (Fernandez et al, 2016) have attracted researchers' attention. For instance, prior studies of inter-firm coopetition have observed game theory processes (Ding et al, 2018) and criticized the institutional environment (Froese et al, 2019). To enrich the literature, this study aims to establish a concise framework that can be widely used in the Chinese environment considering its Eastern cultural background.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coopetition approach is used among B2B partners in the manufacturing industry. For example, Ding et al [124] investigated the coopetition relationship between manufacturers and collectors in waste mobile phone collection.…”
Section: Coopetition Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evolutionary game theory was developed to overcome the disadvantages of traditional game theory when analyzing the bounded rationality of players and the dynamic process of game playing [35][36][37][38][39]. In the process of coal-mine safety production in China, the players are bounded rational and they change their strategies dynamically by observing and comparing payoff with others and then adjust their strategies.…”
Section: Trilateral Game Model Of Coal-mine Safety Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%