Analysis of Energy-Related Carbon Emissions in Inner Mongolia, China

Abstract

Inner Mongolia has shown both rapid economic growth and a large renewable energy base, this has come about by the introduction of the "Western Development" strategy and renewable energy policy of the Chinese Government. However, this has led to a contradictory situation where both high carbon emission and reduction exist together. The average economic growth of Inner Mongolia reached 15.76% between 2006 and 2016, which caused huge CO 2 emissions. However, promotion of the renewable energy policy (since 2005) resulted in an energy self-sufficiency rate that reached 270.80% by 2016. In this study of the Inner Mongolia carbon emission situation, the logarithmic mean divisia index (LMDI) model was used to analyze the factors affecting carbon emission fluctuations from 2005 to 2016. The decoupling elasticity index was then used to measure the decoupling effect of the economic growth and carbon emissions. The results of this research show that: firstly, CO 2 emissions increased rapidly from 651.03 million tons in 2006 to 1723.24 million tons in 2013. Despite a slight decline in CO 2 emissions, a level above 1600 million tons was maintained between 2014 and 2016. Secondly, the industry sector was the main source of CO 2 emissions in Inner Mongolia, and coal-based fuel played a determining role. Thirdly, in this study, two important contributions were made, including the discovery of two new drivers: labor and emission intensity factors. Further, findings about the effect of the six industrial sectors, economic structure, energy density, and emission intensity factors were also decomposed. It was found that during research period, the population factor, labor factor, and labor productivity factor all had a positive influence on CO 2 emissions, whereas the economic structure factor and emission intensity factor had different impacts on the CO 2 emissions depending on the particular industrial sector. Furthermore, the energy intensity of six industrial sectors contributed to the decrease in aggregate CO 2 emissions. Finally, in this study, it was also found that economic growth and CO 2 growth in Inner Mongolia presented a weak decoupling state. Policy recommendations based on these results have been presented.

Renewable Energy, Economic Growth and Economic Development Nexus: A Bibliometric Analysis

“…According to [51], for these economies, the flow of foreign direct investment (FDI) and the development of the financial market are fundamental in promoting the consumption of renewable energies, in addition to reducing emissions and promoting economic growth. The BRICS economies were also investigated in isolation: Brazil was studied by [54][55][56], Russia by [57], China and India by [58] and China by several [59][60][61][62][63][64][65], and there were also investigations for Chinese provinces such as [66,67]. Moreover, Brazil, China and the USA were studied by [68], China and USA in [69], and China, USA, France and Japan by [70].…”

Empirical analysis of the role of the environmental accountability system in energy conservation and emission reduction in China

“…Referring to previous studies, the control variable set of this paper is shown as follows: Urbanization leads to the aggregation of human activities, increasing the volume of energy consumption and carbon emissions. Therefore, the urban population is selected as the proxy variable for the country's population size 46 . Energy consumption and carbon emissions are directly affected by a country's economic aggregate; thus, gross domestic product (GDP) is used as a proxy variable 5 .…”

The Quantification of Carbon Emission Factors for Residential Buildings in Yunnan Province

“…Sun et al [23] combined the Kaya identity factor in the LMDI and IPAT models with the Tapio decoupling index method in the exponential decomposition method. In another study, Tseng [24] used the LMDI to decompose the carbon emission factors of Inner Mongolia, China, developed the decoupling index, and analyzed the factors to assess the decoupling status. On the whole, it is more common for scholars to combine the IPAT model with the LMDI in the exponential decomposition method.…”