2013
DOI: 10.1080/07373937.2013.778863
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Energy Consumption in Drying Process of Biomaterials Using a Combined Unsymmetrical Double-Feed Microwave and Vacuum System (CUMV)—Case Study: Tea Leaves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Schematic of the control volume during a drying process in a CMCB. [115] The mass balance equation can be defined as in Eq. (36).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Schematic of the control volume during a drying process in a CMCB. [115] The mass balance equation can be defined as in Eq. (36).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exergy analysis has been increasingly accepted as a useful tool in the design, assessment, optimization, and improvement of energy systems. For example, Jindarat et al [115] experimentally investigated the energy consumption during the drying of non-hygroscopic porous packed beds by an industrial CMCB, as shown in Fig. 9, accounting for the effects of drying time, hot-air temperature, porous structure (F-or C-bed), and magnetron location on the overall drying kinetics and energy consumption.…”
Section: Energy and Exergy Analysesmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Intermittent power delivery is also shown to improve energy performance in some cases (Yongsawatdigul and Gunasekaran, 1996;Aghilinategh et al, 2015) or worsen it in other cases (e.g. Jindarat et al, 2013). Product properties (e.g.…”
Section: Review Of Energy Performance Studies In Microwave Food Procementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1,3] Industrial sludge management requires careful consideration because the associated costs can constitute 50% or more of the overall wastewater treatment cost. [3][4][5][6][7] Solids handling alternatives should be chosen considering the sludge properties (e.g., dry solids content, moisture distribution, lost on ignition, oil and grease content, and hazardous or non-hazardous components). In addition, handling and stabilization requirements, local land, energy, and labor costs, local, state, and federal regulations for solids treatment and disposal should be considered in life cycle assessment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%