1987
DOI: 10.1016/0005-7916(87)90068-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of demand conditions associated with stereotypy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
24
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also widely presumed that stereotypy serves no function (e.g., Bodfish et al, 2000;Matson et al), but it has also been postulated that it might be automatically reinforced by the sensory consequences that it produces (e.g., Iwata, 1999;Lovaas, Newsom, & Hickman, 1987;Rincover, 1978). There is some evidence that stereotypy can be related to demand situations (Mace, Browder, & Lin, 1987) and is perhaps sensitive to other social consequences (e.g., Kennedy, Meyer, Knowles, & Shukla, 2000); however, experimental analyses of stereotypy often indicate that it is either reinforced by sensory consequences emanating from engaging in the behavior or is controlled by multiple sources of reinforcement, including the sensory consequences (Iwata; Kennedy et al).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also widely presumed that stereotypy serves no function (e.g., Bodfish et al, 2000;Matson et al), but it has also been postulated that it might be automatically reinforced by the sensory consequences that it produces (e.g., Iwata, 1999;Lovaas, Newsom, & Hickman, 1987;Rincover, 1978). There is some evidence that stereotypy can be related to demand situations (Mace, Browder, & Lin, 1987) and is perhaps sensitive to other social consequences (e.g., Kennedy, Meyer, Knowles, & Shukla, 2000); however, experimental analyses of stereotypy often indicate that it is either reinforced by sensory consequences emanating from engaging in the behavior or is controlled by multiple sources of reinforcement, including the sensory consequences (Iwata; Kennedy et al).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent research has shown that stereotypic behavior among persons with developmental disabilities can be affected by social contingencies (e.g., Durand & Carr, 1987;Mace, Browder, & Lin, 1987). Most subjects in these studies engaged in high rates of stereotypy when presented with challenging tasks or when the arranged consequence for stereotypy was a brief escape from task-related de-mands.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Investigations of the properties of demands that establish escape motivation are limited. However, investigators have identified a number of dimensions that are salient in one or more cases, including task difficulty (Carr & Durand, 1985a;Weeks & Gaylord-Ross, 1981), type of required motor responses (Dunlap, KernDunlap, Clarke, & Robbins, 1991), number of required responses (Mace, Browder, & Lin, 1987), task novelty (Mace et al, 1987), duration of instructional sessions (Dunlap et al, 1991), rate of task presentation (Smith, Iwata, Goh, & Shore, 1995), unpredictability of events (Flannery & Horner, 1994), and task preference (Dunlap et al, 1991;Foster-Johnson, Ferro, & Dunlap, 1994). In addition, the probability of problem behavior following a particular demand may be reduced by prior or interspersed events such as storytelling (Carr, Newsom, & Binkoff, 1976), social comments (Kennedy, Itkonen, & Lindquist, 1995), demands highly likely to be complied with (Mace & Belfiore, 1990), and advance notification (Tustin, 1995).…”
Section: Social-negative Reinforcementmentioning
confidence: 99%