2020
DOI: 10.3390/app10176129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Crack Behaviour in Pipeline System Using FAD Diagram Based on Numerical Simulation under XFEM

Abstract: For a long time, cracked structures have triggered various researchers to develop a structural integrity approach and design models to address the fracture problems. In the present study, a pipeline with an axial semi-elliptical surface defect was examined in detail. Recent works have highlighted the use of the classical finite element method (CFEM) as numerical tools to solve the fracture mechanics; however, this approach comes with a few difficulties in the modelling aspects. To overcome this issue, we propo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(59 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The (FAD) from Eq. (29) (KIII) by (Ocejo et al, 1997;Ainsworth, 1993;May, 2002;MacLennan, 1996;Schaser, 1994;Sanderson et al, 2015;Ainsworth et al, 2016;Amann, 2017;Orrock, 2018;Meek, 2017;Amara et al, 2018;Fuentes et al, 2018;Hassani et al, 2018;Hoh et al, 2018;Mai, 2018;Montassir et al, 2020) is compared with the unified Persian curve (PSU) in Fig. 8.…”
Section: Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The (FAD) from Eq. (29) (KIII) by (Ocejo et al, 1997;Ainsworth, 1993;May, 2002;MacLennan, 1996;Schaser, 1994;Sanderson et al, 2015;Ainsworth et al, 2016;Amann, 2017;Orrock, 2018;Meek, 2017;Amara et al, 2018;Fuentes et al, 2018;Hassani et al, 2018;Hoh et al, 2018;Mai, 2018;Montassir et al, 2020) is compared with the unified Persian curve (PSU) in Fig. 8.…”
Section: Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pillai et al (2019) work covers the validation of standard safety assessment procedure in the new BS 7910: 2013+ A1:2015 for cracked joints. Analysis of crack behavior in pipeline system using (FAD) based on numerical simulation under XFEM is proposed by (Montassir et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The introduction of the penalty factor of (1.1) guarantees that there are no assessment points, which are located in the intermediate region. Montessori's 2020 proposed a combined volumetric technique (VM) based on the extended finite element method (XFEM) to generate the FAD curve to check the safety of a (P264GH) steel gas pipe with a peak internal pressure of 6 MPa [16]. The geometry of their test was modeled with XFEM in a three-dimensional space of the solid type which was established with ABAQUS/CAE with the standard/explicit scheme.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerical simulation and discontinuity problems still do not agree, since researchers are always looking to improve numerical solutions to be able to reflect reality. In this sense, various numerical methods are developed that cite the classical finite element method (CFEM) [1,2], element-free Galerkin methods (EFG) [3], the extended finite element method (X-FEM) [4][5][6], the phase field numerical manifold method (PFNMM) [7], the boundary element method [8], and the thermo-mechanical peridynamic model (TMPM) [9]. Despite the huge use of the CFEM, however, it suffers from a certain lack of treatment of the cracking problems; it imposes that the mesh conforms with the crack or to a surface defect, and adopting a specific mesh creates difficulties at the simulation stage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%