2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2003.12.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with difference scores

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
53
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
53
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…2 Given the quasi-experimental design of this study with the non-randomized group factor, we analyzed HR reactivity without controlling for these HR baseline differences (Jamieson, 2004). Means and standard errors of heart rate reactivity in beats per minute.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Given the quasi-experimental design of this study with the non-randomized group factor, we analyzed HR reactivity without controlling for these HR baseline differences (Jamieson, 2004). Means and standard errors of heart rate reactivity in beats per minute.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In nonrandomised trials such as the present study using change scores as dependent variable should be preferred over ANCOVA as the latter tends to deliver biased results (Jamieson, 2004;van Breukelen, 2013). These change scores inform about the extent and direction of change but not about the absolute value in cognition or in behaviour.…”
Section: Changes In Behaviour and Social-cognitive Factorsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The dysphoria main effect was not significant, F(1, 62) = 0.17, p = .68. As HR baseline values did not significantly correlate with HR reactivity, r(66) = -.11, p = .39, and in light of the quasiexperimental study design (see Jamieson, 2004), we did not adjust HR reactivity with respect to HR baseline values.…”
Section: Cardiovascular Baselinesmentioning
confidence: 99%