2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00345-008-0319-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of complications from 600 retroperitoneoscopic procedures of the upper urinary tract during the last 10 years

Abstract: Retroperitoneoscopy can be the technique of choice for accessing and carrying out all the surgery of the upper urinary tract respecting the principles of oncological surgery. After experience with 600 cases during the last 10 years the technique has become safe, simplified, reproducible and effective although not easy. Most complications are minor and easily managed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
42
1
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
4
42
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…[21][22][23][24] Many studies have shown that retroperitoneal LDN is as safe and feasible as transperitoneal LDN, with less invasiveness than transperitoneal LDN. [25][26][27] The aim of LDN is to decrease operative trauma to the donor and guarantee as much as graft quality as possible. Incisional trauma to some degree is important for the donor deciding to donate, especially for young women.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[21][22][23][24] Many studies have shown that retroperitoneal LDN is as safe and feasible as transperitoneal LDN, with less invasiveness than transperitoneal LDN. [25][26][27] The aim of LDN is to decrease operative trauma to the donor and guarantee as much as graft quality as possible. Incisional trauma to some degree is important for the donor deciding to donate, especially for young women.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By the retroperitoneal technique, entry in the peritoneal cavity is avoided so that adhesions from previous operations or other intraperitoneal diseases are not involved in the procedure (Fernández-Cruz et al 1999;Bonjer et al 2000;Suzuki et al 2001). Also, the possibility of complications such as visceral and vascular injury may be reduced and postoperative adhesions and peritonitis are minimized (Liapis et al 2008). In addition, the retroperitoneal approach may be beneficial for obese patients or those with pre-existing cardiorespiratory deficiency, because of the avoidance of the hemodynamic and respiratory effects of carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum (Wolf et al 1995;Fernández-Cruz et al 1996;Fareli-Matin .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main disadvantage of the retroperitoneal approach is the limited working space and therefore it is more difficult to manage large tumours via this technique (Fernández-Cruz et al 1996Bonjer et al 1997Bonjer et al , 2000. Additionally, the limited skin area available can possibly make the port placement difficult and improper which may result in colonic injury because of the relatively fixed peritoneal fixation (Liapis et al 2008). One of the main advantages of the lateral retroperitoneal approach over the posterior is that it can be converted to flank transperitoneal if the dissection becomes difficult to proceed (Fernández-Cruz et al 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Retroperitoneoscopy is a reliable and widespread method for treating urological problems [8]. The fascia of the psoas muscle with posterior perirenal fascia is anatomically placed in the retroperitoneal space [9], so we had thought that retroperitoneoscopic drainage can be used instead of open surgical drainage for psoas abscesses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%