Analysis of Clinical Efficacy of Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery for Uterine Fibroids

Zhu, W. D.; Mao, Shiqin; Chen, Yan; Kong, Xiangfu

doi:10.1155/2022/5606998

Cited by 4 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This minimally invasive approach has been used not only for inguinal hernia repairs, but also for cholecystectomies, myomectomies, and gastrointestinal surgeries. [15][16][17] Despite its theoretically less invasive nature, the challenges and effectiveness of single-incision laparoscopic surgery in practical applications warrant further investigation. Accordingly, we designed this present study to explore differences in efficacy and safety between the SIL-TEP technique and the traditional three-port laparoscopic TEP technique for inguinal hernia repair at our centre.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Single-port versus traditional three-port laparoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: A single-centre, prospective, randomised study

Li,

Hu,

et al. 2024

J Int Med Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective To explore the efficacy and safety of single-incision laparoscopic (SIL) technique compared with the traditional three-port total extraperitoneal (TEP) technique for inguinal hernia repair. Methods This prospective, randomised study involved patients who underwent surgery for inguinal hernia at our hospital from December 2021 to July 2023. Patients were randomly assigned to SIL-TEP or TEP groups based on a computer-generated random number table. Perioperative clinical indicators for the surgical approaches were evaluated. Results Of the 127 patients eligible for study, 66 were randomised to the SIL-TEP group and 61 to the TEP group. The operation time for SIL-TEP was significantly longer than for TEP but the time to return to normal activities was significantly shorter and short-term pain score was significantly lower. There were no differences between groups in intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stays, pain relief time, hospitalization costs or cosmetic satisfaction scores. Conclusion While SIL-TEP is more challenging than TEP for hernia repair, we found that at our centre it is comparable with regard to overall safety and feasibility. Further studies are needed to validate our findings.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Single-port versus traditional three-port laparoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: A single-centre, prospective, randomised study

Li,

Hu,

et al. 2024

J Int Med Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A total of 501 studies were included, including 19 studies (with data from 3352 patients) (Figure 1) (15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33). They were published between 2013 and 2022 (Table 1, Supplement Table 1).…”

Section: Characteristics Of Included Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of efficacy of single-port versus conventional laparoscopic treatment for uterine leiomyoma: a latest meta-analysis

Li³

2023

Front. Oncol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectiveSingle-port laparoscopy has been proposed as an ideal surgical method for the treatment of uterine leiomyoma. It can effectively remove the lesion, reduce the loss of hemoglobin, and has superior cosmetic effects. Therefore, we searched relevant studies and conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of single-port laparoscopy on myoma resection, hemoglobin loss, and scar beauty compared to conventional laparoscopy.MethodsWe systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, scope, Cochrane, CNKI, and other databases to find randomized controlled studies on the efficacy of single-port laparoscopy and traditional laparoscopy for meta-analysis. The main outcomes of our study were the duration of surgery, the reduction of hemoglobin, and the cosmetic effect of the postoperative scar. The effect model was selected according to heterogeneity (random effect model or fixed effect model), and the relevant sensitivity analysis and publication bias test were performed.ResultsWe searched a total of 501 related literature articles and finally included 19 studies involving 21 researchers. Comparison of single-port laparoscopic myomectomy with traditional surgery: Operation time had no significant difference (Standardized Mean Difference [SMD]: 0.13, 95% Confidence interval (CI), -0.04 to 0.30; I²=74%; P = 0.14); The reduction of hemoglobin is lower ([SMD]: -0.04; 95% CI, -0.23 to 0.14; I²=71%; P = 0.65), and the cosmetic effect of postoperative scar is more satisfactory ([SMD]: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.02 to 0.83; I²=72%, P= 0.04). There was no significant difference in conversion rate, postoperative pain, blood loss, postoperative gastrointestinal recovery time, or length of hospital stay.ConclusionCompared with traditional laparoscopy, the operation time of the treatment of uterine leiomyoma by single-port laparoscopy is not extended, the reduction of hemoglobin is less, and the cosmetic effect of the scar is better. Therefore, single-port laparoscopy is superior to traditional surgery in the treatment of uterine leiomyoma.Systematic review registrationhttps://inplasy.com/inplasy-2023-3-0071/, identifier INPLASY202330071.

show abstract

“…This article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [ 1 ]. This investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Retracted: Analysis of Clinical Efficacy of Laparoendoscopic Single‐Site Surgery for Uterine Fibroids

Healthcare Engineering

2023

Journal of Healthcare Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Analysis of Clinical Efficacy of Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery for Uterine Fibroids

Cited by 4 publications

References 9 publications

Single-port versus traditional three-port laparoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: A single-centre, prospective, randomised study

Single-port versus traditional three-port laparoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: A single-centre, prospective, randomised study

Comparison of efficacy of single-port versus conventional laparoscopic treatment for uterine leiomyoma: a latest meta-analysis

Retracted: Analysis of Clinical Efficacy of Laparoendoscopic Single‐Site Surgery for Uterine Fibroids

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About