2004
DOI: 10.2533/000942904777677957
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Cannabis Material by Headspace Solid-Phase Microextraction Combined with Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry

Abstract: A headspace solid-phase microextraction method combined with gas chromatography/mass spectrometry was developed for the direct analysis of cannabis samples. Different parameters influencing the extraction of cannabinoids were studied and the optimised method was applied to the analysis of plants from two different regions in Switzerland. Applied to cannabinoid concentrations, a principal components analysis was applied and demonstrated sample discrimination.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Evaluation of the effect of the fiber coating on extraction efficiencies of Δ 9 -THC, CBD and CBN from herbal cannabis samples showed that among polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) 100 µm, PDMS/divinylbenzene (PDMS/DVB) 65 µm, Carboxen ® /PDMS and divinylbenzene/Carboxen ® /PDMS (DVB/Carboxen ® /PDMS) 50/30 µm, PDMS 100 µm performed optimally in general, although the PDMS/DVB fiber provided higher extraction efficiency for CBD, due to its higher polarity and affinity to PDMS/DVB. Among the three exposure temperatures (80 °C, 90 °C, 150 °C), 150 °C was optimal, simultaneously promoting volatilization and decarboxylation [ 59 , 148 ]. Extraction time depends upon matrix viscosity and lipophilicity that define the speed of diffusion of analytes from the liquid to the gas phase and, as a result, HS-SPME rate and efficiency.…”
Section: Analytical Methods For Phytocannabinoid Profilingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Evaluation of the effect of the fiber coating on extraction efficiencies of Δ 9 -THC, CBD and CBN from herbal cannabis samples showed that among polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) 100 µm, PDMS/divinylbenzene (PDMS/DVB) 65 µm, Carboxen ® /PDMS and divinylbenzene/Carboxen ® /PDMS (DVB/Carboxen ® /PDMS) 50/30 µm, PDMS 100 µm performed optimally in general, although the PDMS/DVB fiber provided higher extraction efficiency for CBD, due to its higher polarity and affinity to PDMS/DVB. Among the three exposure temperatures (80 °C, 90 °C, 150 °C), 150 °C was optimal, simultaneously promoting volatilization and decarboxylation [ 59 , 148 ]. Extraction time depends upon matrix viscosity and lipophilicity that define the speed of diffusion of analytes from the liquid to the gas phase and, as a result, HS-SPME rate and efficiency.…”
Section: Analytical Methods For Phytocannabinoid Profilingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For fatty/oily matrices, such as versatile hemp foods, alkaline hydrolysis with NaOH and Na 2 CO 3 is performed prior to HS-SPME in order to saponify the matrix lipids and reduce lipid matrix interferences [ 99 ]. Therefore, extraction time varies depending upon the sample matrix, from 10 min for herbal cannabis [ 59 , 148 ] to 25 min for different hemp food products [ 99 ]. Finally, desorption time depends upon analytes’ lipophilicities [ 148 ].…”
Section: Analytical Methods For Phytocannabinoid Profilingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compounds found were characterized using a mass spectrum database (NIST05) and data from the literature [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of the literature available focuses on the extraction of the chemical profile of cannabis seizures [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] but limited information is available regarding the methodology developed for interpreting hashish profiles showing similar characteristics [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SPME, in headspace mode, was used for the extraction of cannabinoids directly from the plants [16]. The developed method was applied to the analysis of two series of cannabis samples from Switzerland, harvested in Geneva, Neuchâtel, and Zürich.…”
Section: Data Analysis Of Cannabis Samples After Solid-phase Microextmentioning
confidence: 99%