2014
DOI: 10.1109/mcom.2014.6766083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of and proposal for a disaster information network from experience of the Great East Japan Earthquake

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a problem can be treated by introducing redundant power sources that the network may use in case of a disaster so as to avoid any compromises to its correct behaviour. In the design of a Never Die Network (NDN) presented in [44], selfpowered fixed wireless network stations, cognitive mobile stations and wireless balloon stations represent a set of solutions to tolerate energy outage without affecting the network. Also in [45], there is a discussion of a planning framework to reduce telecommunication network power supply vulnerability during natural (earthquakes, hurricanes, storms and blizzards for example) and man-made disasters.…”
Section: Enhancing the Disaster-resistance Of Existing Network mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a problem can be treated by introducing redundant power sources that the network may use in case of a disaster so as to avoid any compromises to its correct behaviour. In the design of a Never Die Network (NDN) presented in [44], selfpowered fixed wireless network stations, cognitive mobile stations and wireless balloon stations represent a set of solutions to tolerate energy outage without affecting the network. Also in [45], there is a discussion of a planning framework to reduce telecommunication network power supply vulnerability during natural (earthquakes, hurricanes, storms and blizzards for example) and man-made disasters.…”
Section: Enhancing the Disaster-resistance Of Existing Network mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…eNBs at local cell sites have battery backups, which may last for up to 8 hours depending on traffic loads at the site [3][4]. The number of cell phone call requests immediately after a natural disaster incident shoots up to 8 to 10 times more than during normal situations [5]. In recent times, multiple counter mechanisms are proposed that mostly aim at increasing the backup power capacity in base stations.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include the use of fuel cells and hydrogen back up power supply as well as providing base stations with powerful generators that are able to sustain longer [6][7][8]. A robust never die network (NDN) constituting of self-powered fixed base stations, cognitive mobile base stations and wireless balloon stations is proposed in [5]. The sudden substantial spikes in network traffic load in the disaster areas overwhelm the transmission capabilities of the network resulting in a lack of spectrum availability for communication.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even if there is a wide panorama of solutions to enhance PSNs, actual assessments of disaster response capabilities in terms of response time and available capacity have underlined the limitations [7] of current PSNs and the open issues in case of real disasters (e.g., Japan Earthquake 2011). The main problems of that inefficiency are due to the following: Thus, future 5G networks can provide the right infrastructure to address all the above problems via dedicated interfaces for ultrareliable low-latency communications (URLLCs), supported by efficient virtualization, slicing, and dynamic adaptation: this can guarantee an effective amount of bandwidth and significantly lower delays under critical conditions as well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%