2014
DOI: 10.1177/2211068213517119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Airborne Biomarkers for Point-of-Care Diagnostics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 200 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The application of these e-nose solutions to large populations is much easier than a comprehensive study using MS detection and certainly the data obtained would be very relevant. Nevertheless, there are a number of issues that have to be solved before e-noses can reach a level to be used in medical diagnosis (reviewed in [ 7 , 152 , 153 ]).…”
Section: Exhaled Breath (Eb) Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application of these e-nose solutions to large populations is much easier than a comprehensive study using MS detection and certainly the data obtained would be very relevant. Nevertheless, there are a number of issues that have to be solved before e-noses can reach a level to be used in medical diagnosis (reviewed in [ 7 , 152 , 153 ]).…”
Section: Exhaled Breath (Eb) Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, there is an outstanding need to monitor pathogens in air in critical infrastructure such as government buildings, hospitals, mass transit, and airports, during manufacturing in clean rooms and ‘ready-to-eat’ food preparation, to name but a few. There is also a growing interest in detection of infectious bioaerosols for point-of-care diagnostics ( Fung and Mykhaylova, 2014 ). Most air samplers operate by filtration, electrostatic precipitation, or inertial/gravitational collection ( Fronczek and Yoon, 2015 ; Sharma Ghimire et al , 2019 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome challenges associated with bioaerosol exposure studies, the aerosol science community has identified the need to explore new alternatives for assessing bioaerosol exposure. For example, the identification of markers associated with exposure could help ascertain which environments pose the highest risks (Fung and Mikhaylova 2014;Garcia-Alcega et al 2017). Recent studies have identified a strong correlation between the bacterial community of the upper respiratory tract (nasal cavity and nasopharynx) of exposed subjects and the bioaerosols collected from the environment they were exposed to, using an HTS approach (Mbareche et al, manuscript in preparation;Kraemer et al 2018).…”
Section: Environmental Exposure Markersmentioning
confidence: 99%