2014
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/555/1/012007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of aeroelastic loads and their contributions to fatigue damage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As highlighted before, the x axes represent frequency and the values are hidden to protect Siemens data confidentiality. It has been highlighted in several previous studies that frequencies that are lower than approximately 10 times the rotor rated speed (1P) contribute most to fatigue loads (up to 2 Hz for turbines with 1P = 0.2 Hz; see Sim et al, 2012;Bergami and Gaunaa, 2014), and so the range shown in the figures in this paper includes the frequencies most important for load analysis. The peaks representing the frequencies with the highest energy in each figure have been highlighted and labeled as A, B, C, etc., and the comparisons among FAST, BHawC, and the measurements presented in these figures are discussed relative to these peaks in the following paragraphs.…”
Section: Discussion Of Results In the Frequency Domainmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…As highlighted before, the x axes represent frequency and the values are hidden to protect Siemens data confidentiality. It has been highlighted in several previous studies that frequencies that are lower than approximately 10 times the rotor rated speed (1P) contribute most to fatigue loads (up to 2 Hz for turbines with 1P = 0.2 Hz; see Sim et al, 2012;Bergami and Gaunaa, 2014), and so the range shown in the figures in this paper includes the frequencies most important for load analysis. The peaks representing the frequencies with the highest energy in each figure have been highlighted and labeled as A, B, C, etc., and the comparisons among FAST, BHawC, and the measurements presented in these figures are discussed relative to these peaks in the following paragraphs.…”
Section: Discussion Of Results In the Frequency Domainmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The adaptive flap controllers alleviate loads mainly in the low frequency range of the spectrum (0.1-0.5 Hz), and especially around the 1P rotational frequency (0.2 Hz). As the loads in the low frequency range are responsible for the largest contribution to the blade root flapwise fatigue damage [19,27], it is beneficial to discourage the activity of the flap actuators at higher frequencies by introducing a frequency-dependent weighting in the LQ control algorithm. The frequency weighting penalizes control activity at frequencies above 0.5 Hz, thus limiting the total flap movement and the maximum deflection rate, hence effectively reducing the wear of hypothetical flap actuators.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wind field is characterized by a normal terrain shear, described by the power law relation with exponent 0.2; the effects of tower shadow are accounted for, and Mann's turbulence model [31] is applied to generate a 3D turbulent field for a class B turbine, with turbulence intensity ranging from 17 % at 12 m/s to 14 % at 24 m/s. Bergami and Gaunaa [27] report that wind turbine operations below rated wind speed are responsible for only minor contribution to the blade flapwise lifetime fatigue damage; furthermore, active alleviation of the rotor loads below rated power would reduce the turbine energy capture. Therefore, in this case, the flap load alleviation control is only applied to operation above rated wind speed, and aeroelastic simulations are performed for mean wind speeds from 12 to 24 m/s.…”
Section: Wind Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations