1995
DOI: 10.1016/0041-624x(95)92035-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of adaptive imaging algorithms for ultrasonic non-destructive testing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For that contact point type transducers with a hemispherical plastic tip and with 180 kHz resonant frequency were exploited. Experiments were performed using a scanner Standa 8MTF-75LS05 (Standa Ltd., Vilnius, Lithuania) and the ultrasonic measurement system “Ultralab” [ 27 ] ( Figure 6 ). All units including the ultrasonic transducers and the ultrasonic system “Ultralab” were developed at Ultrasound Research Institute of the Kaunas University of Technology.…”
Section: Experimental Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For that contact point type transducers with a hemispherical plastic tip and with 180 kHz resonant frequency were exploited. Experiments were performed using a scanner Standa 8MTF-75LS05 (Standa Ltd., Vilnius, Lithuania) and the ultrasonic measurement system “Ultralab” [ 27 ] ( Figure 6 ). All units including the ultrasonic transducers and the ultrasonic system “Ultralab” were developed at Ultrasound Research Institute of the Kaunas University of Technology.…”
Section: Experimental Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the above analysis it can be seen that the stenciling system hardware control mode is characterized by (1) The hardware control circuit structure of the stenciling system is relatively complicated, but the processing is speedy, and no computer processing time is used.…”
Section: The Hardware System Analysis Of the Stenciling Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the above analysis, the software-controlled methods are: first the host computer gives the delay time based on the detection speed. Assumed that the first channel needs 20s delay time, and the accuracy is 0.1s, to make the delay time [1]. Delay Control to maximum, ie 199, then doing spray, the detailed flow chart 2 is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Software System Analysis Of the Stenciling Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation