2020
DOI: 10.1002/cae.22251
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of adaptive e‐learning systems with adjustment of Felder‐Silverman model in a Moodle DLS

Abstract: E‐learning, as a complex system, includes distance learning, teaching materials in various forms and shapes, group and individual learning processes, as well as interactive and tutorial work. To increase the effectiveness and efficiency of the e‐learning system, it is necessary first of all to consider the characteristics of students and their learning styles. Based on the data collected in various ways, in surveys, using the distance learning dystem (DLS) Moodle, based on the subjective assessment of the subj… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, it has been found that the utilization of Moodle resources differed depending on whether the teacher was an expert in e-Learning vs. a non-expert regardless of the teaching modality (F2F, Blended Learning, or e-Learning). In particular, the expert teachers used more resources with their students linked to the implementation of metacognitive skills for planning, such as 'Label' (a resource that facilitates the cognitive structuring of information) and 'Page' (a resource that facilitates the embedding of videos) [22,27,28]. Even so, it must be pointed out that the expert teachers only utilized 62.5% of possible resources, which indicates that this type of teacher could still increase the inclusion of other resources and activities that enrich teaching in virtual spaces such as 'IMS content package' and 'Resources FAQ'.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, it has been found that the utilization of Moodle resources differed depending on whether the teacher was an expert in e-Learning vs. a non-expert regardless of the teaching modality (F2F, Blended Learning, or e-Learning). In particular, the expert teachers used more resources with their students linked to the implementation of metacognitive skills for planning, such as 'Label' (a resource that facilitates the cognitive structuring of information) and 'Page' (a resource that facilitates the embedding of videos) [22,27,28]. Even so, it must be pointed out that the expert teachers only utilized 62.5% of possible resources, which indicates that this type of teacher could still increase the inclusion of other resources and activities that enrich teaching in virtual spaces such as 'IMS content package' and 'Resources FAQ'.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particularly worth highlighting are the investigative studies on teaching and learning styles and learning strategies within the university environment [17][18][19]. Nevertheless, there are few studies that have approached the investigation of those aspects in virtual learning environments (e-Learning or Blended Learning), because investigation in this context is still at an early stage [20][21][22]. With respect to the learning style, the studies of Camarero et al [18] defined four learning styles in accordance with the classification of Kolb [23]: active style (learning based on direct experience), reflexive style (learning based on observation and data collection), theoretical style (learning based on abstract conceptualization and the preparation of conclusions), and pragmatic style (learning based on active experimentation and the search for practical applications).…”
Section: Form Of Teaching and Form Of Learning In Blended Learning Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The system is widely accepted across Indonesia, needs continuous improvement in contents at par with time. Zlatkovic et al recommends that the e-learning system has to improve in design, course, information, search in the context of learners for higher education institutions [28].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%