2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2012.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of a competitive prey–predator system with a prey refuge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Within predator–prey relationships, prey size refuge effects may also influence trophic dynamics and mediate population stability (Sih, ; Emmerson & Raffaelli, ; Sarwardi et al ., , ). In turn, these factors can lead to peak interaction strengths at intermediate predator–prey body size ratios (Barrios‐O'Neill et al ., ; Brose et al ., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within predator–prey relationships, prey size refuge effects may also influence trophic dynamics and mediate population stability (Sih, ; Emmerson & Raffaelli, ; Sarwardi et al ., , ). In turn, these factors can lead to peak interaction strengths at intermediate predator–prey body size ratios (Barrios‐O'Neill et al ., ; Brose et al ., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of the use of refuges by the prey population on the temporal dynamics of a predator-prey model has been investigated by many eminent researchers [5,18,21,22,28,36]. However, to the best of our knowledge, little attention has been paid to the dynamics of a spatiotemporal predator-prey model incorporating prey refuges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Otolithoides pama and increases gradually, the oscillatory nature of system (3) immediately becomes stable aroundE 3 and it remains up to the refuge value m 2 = 61.5 %. However, further increment of the refuge value m 2 (very small) makes system (3) oscillatory (unstable) around E 2 , which was not found by Sarwardi et al [38]. All these percentages of refuge values used for Figs.…”
Section: Conclusion and Commentsmentioning
confidence: 72%